Skip to main content
Glama
asm-mcp-server

asm-mcp-server

by kalala252

Related Servers

Alternatives to asm-mcp-server

No user-submitted related servers found.

    Related Servers

    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      C
      maintenance
      Enables passive OSINT reconnaissance by providing search dorking and open-source intelligence collection tools through MCP, without requiring active interaction with target systems.
      MIT
    • A
      license
      A
      quality
      C
      maintenance
      Enables MCP-compatible AI clients to run passive OSINT investigation tools for domains, IPs, emails, usernames, breaches, DNS, WHOIS, and reputation checks through natural-language tool calls. It exposes 16 passive tools by default, plus graph and batch helpers, with additional active tools available when explicitly enabled.
      20
      1
      MIT
    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      D
      maintenance
      Enables AI agents to perform grounded web research with injection resistance, claim verification, and cost-aware routing through MCP tools like web_search, fetch_url, extract_claims, and check_grounding.
      MIT
    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      B
      maintenance
      Enables agents and analysts to gather public web information through seven MCP tools, including compliant search across 360/Bing/Sogou, reading pages and documents as Markdown, mapping sitemaps, scholarly lookups, and resumable link-by-link browsing with robots checks and rate limiting.
      2
      MIT
    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      C
      maintenance
      Enables LLM agents to perform keyless searches across fourteen public sources, fuse and rank results, read web pages, find pages similar to a liked URL, and query a local reading history through MCP tools.
      253 npm
      MIT

    TDQS

    A3.6/5.0

    Scored across 6 tools

    Disambiguation5/5

    Each tool has a clearly distinct role: scan_domain initiates a scan, list_reports lists report metadata, get_report_summary provides a detailed summary, list_assets retrieves asset data, get_evidence pulls evidence, and list_vulnerabilities returns vulnerability data. There is no meaningful overlap between these operations.

    Naming Consistency5/5

    All tool names follow a consistent snake_case verb_noun pattern: scan_domain, list_reports, get_report_summary, list_assets, get_evidence, list_vulnerabilities. The verb choice consistently indicates whether the tool creates or retrieves information.

    Tool Count5/5

    Six tools is a well-scoped size for an attack surface management/recon server. Each tool maps to a distinct step in the workflow: scan, report listing, summary, asset enumeration, evidence retrieval, and vulnerability listing.

    Completeness4/5

    The core reconnaissance workflow is well covered: scan a domain, view reports, inspect summaries, list assets, retrieve evidence, and see vulnerabilities. Minor gaps exist around report lifecycle management, such as deleting or updating reports, but users can complete the primary investigation workflow without dead ends.