Skip to main content
Glama
kaiserproger

Agent Loom

by kaiserproger
OverviewSchemaSourceRelated ServersDiscussionsAdmin
JavaScript
Local

Related Servers

Alternatives to Agent Loom

No user-submitted related servers found.

    Related Servers

    • SpaceDock

      starlove7
      A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      B
      maintenance
      Enables ChatGPT to securely control remote development servers over OAuth-protected MCP, exposing workspace-bounded tools for file editing, command execution, Git operations, and running Codex or GitHub Copilot subagents.
      8 npm
      MIT

    • agent-handoff-mcp

      zetkey
      F
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      B
      maintenance
      Centralized multi-project state & handoff MCP server that lets AI agents save checkpoints in one session and resume in another with minimal token overhead, including git snapshots and code-graph integration.
      -

    • pi-mcp

      lucasjingcn
      A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      B
      maintenance
      Orchestrates multiple coding agents at once so an MCP client can delegate implementation work while retaining judgment: each agent runs in its own isolated git worktree and branch, claims the files it edits, and communicates via a mailbox and shared board. Supports blocking questions to the orchestrator, Codex-written acceptance tests locked before workers start, scope validation, and reporting on first-pass success.
      Apache 2.0

    • Pi Conductor

      SamiulH25
      A
      license
      A
      quality
      B
      maintenance
      Enables Codex to orchestrate persistent Pi RPC workers over a local MCP server, spawning dev, explore and review agents in isolated git worktrees or in place. Codex can inspect status, activity, token/cost metrics and real diffs, then merge only the accepted work and clean up idle workers.
      13
      MIT
    Deploy Server
    One endpoint for every MCP toolRayrun runs every MCP server behind one URL and holds the credentials. Each call is decided per client, tool, and argument, then recorded.ray.runAd

    TDQS

    A3.8/5.0

    Scored across 13 tools

    Disambiguation4/5

    Most tools are clearly separated by purpose: tree/search/read handle inspection, write/edit/apply_patch handle distinct modification styles, and bash/show_changes are explicitly kept apart from git/file review. The only mild overlap is between write, edit, and apply_patch, but their descriptions provide clear boundaries, and pi/codex are differentiated by agent name.

    Naming Consistency3/5

    The tool names are readable and consistently lowercase/snake_case, but they mix bare verbs (write, read, edit, search), noun-like commands (tree, bash, workspace), and verb_noun forms (view_image, import_file, show_changes). This is a mixed convention rather than a predictable pattern.

    Tool Count5/5

    Thirteen tools is a reasonable, well-scoped count for a coding workspace server. Each tool addresses a distinct operational need such as file editing, search, verification, change review, workspace routing, or persistent agent interaction, without feeling bloated.

    Completeness3/5

    The set covers core file operations, search, verification, change review, and persistent agent workflows well. However, there are notable gaps: no file delete/remove tool, and the workspace description references a discover capability that is not exposed in the tool list, which creates a potential dead end.

    Maintenance

    ActivitySlowing
    ResponsivenessNo issues

    Resources