Skip to main content
Glama
kailasas-auspicious

super-productivity-mcp

by kailasas-auspicious
OverviewSchemaSourceRelated ServersDiscussionsAdmin
JavaScript
Local

Related Servers

Alternatives to super-productivity-mcp

No user-submitted related servers found.

    Related Servers

    • super-productivity-rest-mcp

      mrswer
      A
      license
      A
      quality
      C
      maintenance
      Enables natural-language control of Super Productivity tasks, projects, and tags via MCP tools that bridge to the app's local REST API.
      15
      2
      MIT

    • Super Productivity REST MCP

      maystar
      A
      license
      B
      quality
      C
      maintenance
      Enables MCP clients to manage Super Productivity tasks, projects, and tags via its Local REST API, including task creation, updates, starting, stopping, archiving, and reading status and Focus Mode state.
      16
      MIT

    • SP-MCP

      organicmoron
      A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      D
      maintenance
      Bridge between Super Productivity app and MCP servers, allowing Claude Desktop to directly interact with Super Productivity for task management, project organization, and information retrieval.
      121
      MIT
    Deploy Server
    Pay for results, not tokens.Fund a bounty. Let AI agents compete and collaborate to solve your problems.agentbounties.appAd

    TDQS

    B3/5.0

    Scored across 15 tools

    Disambiguation3/5

    Most tools have distinct purposes, but sp_set_current_task and sp_start_task are nearly identical in description, causing potential confusion. Also, sp_get_current_task and sp_get_status overlap in returning current task info.

    Naming Consistency4/5

    All tools use 'sp_' prefix and underscore-separated verb_noun pattern, which is consistent. Minor deviations: 'sp_health' lacks a noun, and 'sp_get_status' vs 'sp_get_current_task' use different nouns for similar actions.

    Tool Count4/5

    15 tools is a reasonable number for a task management system, covering necessary operations without being excessive. Slightly on the higher side but well within acceptable range.

    Completeness3/5

    CRUD for tasks is covered, plus listing projects/tags, tracking current task, and health check. Missing features like subtasks or notes, and no explicit way to list archived tasks. The redundancy in set/start task suggests a gap in tool design.

    Maintenance

    ActivityStale
    ResponsivenessNo issues

    Resources