A
licenseA
qualityB
maintenanceThis MCP server enables LLM hosts to plan large tasks and delegate subtasks to specialized local CLI agents, such as Codex and Claude Code, using tools like delegate_task and get_agent_roster.
2
MIT
delegations-mcp
by kaijfox
Related Servers
Alternatives to delegations-mcp
No user-submitted related servers found.
Related Servers
- FlicenseAqualityCmaintenanceAn MCP server that exposes tools for sub-agent style reasoning across multiple LLM providers, enabling delegation of prompts to various models and running critique loops, debates, red-teaming, and answer ranking.6-
- AlicenseAqualityBmaintenanceLocal MCP server that exposes delegation tools for Codex, Claude, and Antigravity CLI, enabling an orchestrator agent to assign tasks to these sub-agents via non-interactive CLI commands.3MIT
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityBmaintenanceMCP server that enables AI agents to run a deterministic orchestration loop with decomposition, subagent execution, and review feedback across multiple LLM backends.59MIT
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityCmaintenanceMCP server that enables delegation of small coding implementations to a cheaper language model with propose_patch and apply_patch tools, while the primary agent retains architecture, review, and approval.MIT
- FlicenseNot gradedqualityCmaintenanceMCP server that enables an agent to spawn sub-agents (a crew) via a local tool, allowing delegation of large tasks to parallel workers with a human approval gate and efficient token usage.-
TDQS
B3.2/5.0
Scored across 3 tools
Disambiguation5/5
Each tool has a clearly distinct purpose: get_delegation retrieves details for a specific delegation, list_delegations lists all delegations and refreshes the registry, and run_delegation executes a delegation and returns results. There is no overlap in functionality, making tool selection unambiguous.
Naming Consistency5/5
All tool names follow a consistent verb_noun pattern with snake_case: get_delegation, list_delegations, run_delegation. The naming is predictable and readable, with no deviations in style or convention.
Tool Count3/5
With only 3 tools, the set feels thin for a delegations management server, as it lacks operations like create, update, or delete delegations. However, the tools cover basic retrieval, listing, and execution, which might be sufficient for a minimal scope.
Completeness3/5
The tools provide read and execute capabilities (get, list, run), but there are notable gaps in lifecycle management, such as creating, updating, or deleting delegations. This could limit agent workflows that require full CRUD operations, though the existing tools support core usage.
Maintenance
ActivityInactive
ResponsivenessNo issues