@kadam-net/mcp-server
OfficialRelated Servers
Alternatives to @kadam-net/mcp-server
No user-submitted related servers found.
Related Servers
- AlicenseAqualityCmaintenanceMCP server for AI agents to manage ad campaigns across Google, Meta, LinkedIn, Microsoft, Reddit, TikTok, and more21259 npm17MIT
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityDmaintenanceAn MCP server for programmatic management of Meta (Facebook/Instagram) advertising campaigns through AI assistants. It enables campaign creation, ad set management, creative upload, analytics, audience management, and conversion tracking.206 npm4MIT
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityDmaintenanceMCP server for managing ad campaigns across Google Ads, Meta, and more. Enables deploying campaigns, checking performance, and managing budgets from terminal or AI assistants.MIT
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityBmaintenanceMCP server for MoltAd, enabling AI agents to register, manage ad campaigns, buy credits, and report ad events through the MoltAd API.MIT
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityAmaintenanceAn MCP server that gives AI agents direct access to the Yandex Direct API to manage campaigns, groups, ads, keywords, bids, and reports via natural language.117 npm6Apache 2.0
- FlicenseNot gradedqualityCmaintenanceMCP server that enables AI agents (Claude Code) to manage Criteo campaigns, ad sets, creatives, audiences, and reports via natural language.-
TDQS
Scored across 30 tools
Most tools target a distinct resource-action pair: campaigns, creatives, audiences, autorules, folders, stats, and finance are clearly separated. The only real ambiguity is the dense cluster of bid-related tools (update_campaign_bid, bulk_update_bids, update_site_bids, update_extended_bids, plus update_campaign), though their descriptions do draw meaningful boundaries.
Every tool follows the same kadam_adv_<verb>_<noun> snake_case pattern, using predictable verbs like list, get, create, update, delete, and set. This consistency makes the 30-tool surface much easier to navigate.
30 tools is a heavy surface for an MCP server, especially with five overlapping bid-mutation tools and several resources that lack explicit delete operations. While the tools cover a broad ad-management domain, the set would be more coherent if consolidated or trimmed.
Core workflows are covered: campaign folders, campaigns, creatives, audiences, autorules, stats, finance, and bid optimization all have sufficient operations. Minor gaps exist—there is no explicit delete for campaigns, creatives, or campaign folders, though status-based archiving may work around those cases.