get_last_update
Fetch the details of the last successfully completed flow update from the local bridge.
Instructions
Return the last successful flow update recorded by the local bridge.
Input Schema
| Name | Required | Description | Default |
|---|---|---|---|
No arguments | |||
Fetch the details of the last successfully completed flow update from the local bridge.
Return the last successful flow update recorded by the local bridge.
| Name | Required | Description | Default |
|---|---|---|---|
No arguments | |||
Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?
No annotations are present, so the description must cover behavioral context. It implies a read-only operation but does not state side effects, idempotency, or authentication needs. However, the tool is simple with no parameters, making hidden behavior unlikely.
Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.
Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?
The description is a single, focused sentence with no extraneous words. It is front-loaded and efficient.
Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.
Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?
Without an output schema, the description does not specify the format or fields of the returned flow update. This may leave the agent uncertain about the return value, though the tool's simplicity mitigates the gap.
Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.
Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?
The tool has zero parameters and 100% schema coverage, so the description does not need to add parameter details. Baseline for zero parameters is 4.
Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.
Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?
The description clearly states the action ('Return') and the specific resource ('last successful flow update') with a clear scope ('local bridge'). It effectively distinguishes from sibling tools like update_flow or apply_flow_update.
Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.
Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?
No guidance is provided on when to use this tool versus alternatives such as get_flow or get_latest_run. The description lacks context about prerequisites or exclusions.
Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.
We provide all the information about MCP servers via our MCP API.
curl -X GET 'https://glama.ai/api/mcp/v1/servers/kaael1/mcp-power-automate'
If you have feedback or need assistance with the MCP directory API, please join our Discord server