Skip to main content
Glama
k-rister

ephemeral-buffer

by k-rister

Related Servers

Alternatives to ephemeral-buffer

No user-submitted related servers found.

    Related Servers

    • A
      license
      A
      quality
      B
      maintenance
      Provides persistent, searchable memory across AI coding agent and chat history (Claude Code, Codex, Gemini CLI, ChatGPT, and more) via retrieval-augmented generation, enabling semantic and hybrid search to retain context across sessions.
      5
      MIT
    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      B
      maintenance
      Enables AI coding agents to retrieve developer context, semantic memory, decisions, and checkpoints across sessions through hybrid full-text and vector search, with token-budgeted retrieval for task-relevant context.
      MIT
    • A
      license
      A
      quality
      C
      maintenance
      Enables AI coding agents to intelligently index and search codebases with sub-20ms retrieval, 8x memory compression, and cross-encoder reranking via MCP stdio.
      5
      MIT
    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      D
      maintenance
      Enables AI coding assistants to search and retrieve information from a locally ingested knowledge base using hybrid search, grounded in user-curated documentation.
      17
      MIT
    • A
      license
      A
      quality
      D
      maintenance
      Provides persistent memory for AI agents using hybrid search (vector embeddings + BM25) with neural reranking, enabling storage and retrieval of insights, debugging solutions, and patterns across coding sessions.
      8
      MIT
    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      D
      maintenance
      Enables AI coding agents to retrieve and manage code context with hybrid search, project memory, and observability via MCP tools.
      29
      MIT

    TDQS

    A3.5/5.0

    Scored across 18 tools

    Disambiguation4/5

    Tools are largely separated by resource type (capture vs execution) and action, with clear roles for ingest, search, retrieval, and diagnostics. A few pairs like execute_and_capture vs start_execution or get_capture_slice vs get_execution_output are close, but their descriptions define sufficiently distinct use cases.

    Naming Consistency5/5

    All tool names follow a consistent lowercase snake_case verb_noun pattern: capture_*, get_*, list_*, clear_*, consolidate_*, start_execution, resume_execution, preflight_command, and set_semantic_index_budget. There are no mixed naming styles or vague generic verbs.

    Tool Count3/5

    18 tools is on the heavy side for a focused ephemeral-buffer server, especially with two overlapping subsystems: captures and executions. The count is not bloated enough to be chaotic, but it exceeds the comfortable well-scoped range.

    Completeness4/5

    Capture workflows are well covered: ingest via text, file, or command; search; slice; consolidate; list; clear; and stats. Execution has start/resume/get/output/list, but there is no cancel or delete operation for executions, which is a notable but not blocking gap.

    Maintenance

    ActivityMaintained
    ResponsivenessResponsive