Tiling Trees MCP Server
Server Configuration
Describes the environment variables required to run the server.
| Name | Required | Description | Default |
|---|---|---|---|
No arguments | |||
Instructions
Guidance the server publishes about itself, which clients place ahead of the tool catalog so the model reads it before choosing anything.
This server publishes no instructions, or was last inspected before Glama recorded them.
Capabilities
Server capabilities have not been inspected yet.
Tools
Functions exposed to the LLM to take actions
| Name | Description |
|---|---|
| create_treeA | Create a new tiling tree to explore a problem/challenge. The tree starts with a root tile representing the complete solution space, which you'll then split recursively using MECE (Mutually Exclusive, Collectively Exhaustive) principles. |
| split_tileB | Split a tile into MECE (Mutually Exclusive, Collectively Exhaustive) subsets using a specific attribute/dimension. This is the core operation of the tiling trees method - partitioning the solution space systematically. Use physics/math-oriented splits when possible. |
| add_tiles_to_splitA | Add additional tiles to an existing split (when you realize a category was missed). This invalidates the MECE validation and requires re-verification. |
| mark_meceC | Mark a split as validated for MECE (Mutually Exclusive, Collectively Exhaustive) properties. Verify that the children completely cover the parent space with no overlaps. |
| evaluate_tileC | Evaluate a leaf tile (concrete idea/project) on impact, feasibility, and uniqueness. Include any calculations or pilot studies performed. |
| update_tileC | Update a tile's information (title, description, split attributes, etc.) |
| get_treesC | Get all tiling trees |
| get_tileC | Get details of a specific tile |
| explore_pathC | Explore the tree structure from a specific tile, showing the hierarchical breakdown |
| get_leaf_tilesC | Get all leaf tiles (concrete ideas/projects) from a tree |
| get_unexplored_tilesB | Get tiles that haven't been split yet - these are gaps in your solution space exploration |
| get_top_leavesC | Get the highest-rated leaf tiles based on evaluation criteria |
| search_tilesC | Search for tiles by content |
| get_coverage_analysisC | Analyze the completeness of solution space exploration for a tree. Shows unexplored branches, unvalidated splits, and suggestions for next steps. |
| get_statisticsB | Get overall statistics about all tiling trees |
| export_treeC | Export a tiling tree in various formats for visualization or documentation |
| validate_split_qualityA | Validate split quality and detect common antipatterns (vague language, catch-all buckets, mixed dimensions, retroactive splitting, incomplete coverage). Returns a detailed quality report with issues and recommendations. |
| get_tree_validation_reportA | Get validation report for all splits in a tree. Identifies antipatterns and provides an overall quality score. Use this after building a tree to check for common failure modes. |
Prompts
Interactive templates invoked by user choice
| Name | Description |
|---|---|
No prompts | |
Resources
Contextual data attached and managed by the client
| Name | Description |
|---|---|
No resources | |
TDQS
Scored across 18 tools
Most tools have distinct purposes, such as create_tree for tree creation, split_tile for splitting, and evaluate_tile for evaluation. However, get_coverage_analysis and get_unexplored_tiles both focus on identifying gaps in exploration, which could cause slight confusion, though their descriptions help differentiate them.
Tool names follow a highly consistent verb_noun pattern throughout, such as create_tree, split_tile, and evaluate_tile. All tools use snake_case and clear action-oriented verbs, making the set predictable and easy to understand.
With 18 tools, the count is slightly high but reasonable for the domain of tiling tree management, covering operations like creation, splitting, evaluation, validation, and analysis. It supports comprehensive workflows without being overly bloated, though it borders on the heavier side.
The tool set provides complete coverage for the tiling tree domain, including CRUD-like operations (create_tree, get_trees, update_tile), core methods (split_tile, mark_mece), evaluation (evaluate_tile), validation (validate_split_quality, get_tree_validation_report), and analysis (get_coverage_analysis, get_statistics). No obvious gaps exist for systematic solution space exploration.