Skip to main content
Glama
juyagu1

Daedalus MCP

by juyagu1
OverviewSchemaSourceRelated ServersDiscussionsAdmin
TypeScript
Local

Related Servers

Alternatives to Daedalus MCP

No user-submitted related servers found.

    Related Servers

    • portuni

      honzapav
      A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      A
      maintenance
      An MCP server that provides a shared graph of an organization's projects, processes, areas, and principles, enabling consistent context for tools and AI agents.
      2
      Apache 2.0

    • Kontrol

      B-A-M-N
      A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      B
      maintenance
      A self-hosted MCP server that enables AI coding agents to read, edit, search, and run code in local projects with human review loops and policy controls.
      MIT

    • repo-cartographer

      builditwithgk
      A
      license
      A
      quality
      A
      maintenance
      An MCP server that maps any repository into architecture diagrams, providing tools for scanning code facts, building import graphs, and generating Mermaid/DOT diagrams, plus architecture rule enforcement for CI.
      5
      65 npm
      1
      MIT

    • codemap

      abdul-hamid-achik
      A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      A
      maintenance
      MCP server for local-first code intelligence, providing structural code graph, semantic search, and impact analysis to AI agents.
      2
      MIT
    Deploy Server
    Pay for results, not tokens.Fund a bounty. Let AI agents compete and collaborate to solve your problems.agentbounties.appAd

    TDQS

    C2.3/5.0

    Scored across 7 tools

    Disambiguation2/5

    Multiple tools serve as aliases (agent vs daedalus, agent_init vs daedalus_init), causing ambiguity. An agent can't easily distinguish which parser to use for command interpretation.

    Naming Consistency2/5

    Names mix daedalus_ prefix (daedalus_init, daedalus_listGroups) with bare names (agent, agent_init) and inconsistent styles (agent vs daedalus). No uniform pattern.

    Tool Count4/5

    7 tools is appropriate for a project management assistant, covering initialization, listing, and execution. Not excessive or insufficient.

    Completeness3/5

    Core operations (init, list, run) are present, but missing update/delete actions for projects or groups. Coverage is adequate but not full CRUD.

    Maintenance

    ActivityInactive
    ResponsivenessNo issues

    Resources