Fetch a GitHub user's public profile and repositories.

Use this to ground resume advice in someone's real GitHub activity: it returns their profile summary plus every public repo with stars, primary language, and creation / last-push dates. Handles users with no public repositories gracefully.

Args: username: The GitHub login to look up (e.g. "octocat").

Find which resume claims a GitHub profile does and doesn't back up.

Extracts the strongest, most concrete claims from the resume, cross-references them against the user's real public repositories, and returns a gap report: which claims have public GitHub evidence and which are gaps to close. Handles an empty or thin GitHub gracefully — that's the common case for engineers whose work lives in private repos, and the report frames it as the gap to close.

Args: resume_text: The full text of the resume to analyze. username: The GitHub login whose public repos ground the analysis.

Prescribe a ranked 30-day plan of projects to make a resume credible.

Builds the resume-vs-GitHub gap report, then prescribes specific, shippable projects to close the highest-value gaps: each is tied to a concrete resume claim it would prove, sized ("a weekend" / "a week"), and scoped (what to skip). This is the star tool — the prescription, not just the diagnosis. Handles an empty or thin GitHub as the main case: it prescribes what to build from scratch rather than reporting that there's nothing to show.

Args: resume_text: The full text of the resume to ground suggestions in. username: The GitHub login whose public repos ground the analysis.