linear-strict
Related Servers
Alternatives to linear-strict
No user-submitted related servers found.
Related Servers
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityBmaintenanceEnables multiple AI agents to share, incrementally synchronize, and restore work context within a common scope using persistent tickets, immutable updates, and text artifacts.MIT
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityBmaintenanceEnables agentic co-authoring of feature specs, decomposition into architecture-validated tickets, and idempotent syncing to Linear as projects with epics, sub-issues, and dependencies.MIT
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityAmaintenanceEnables agents to manage an event-sourced, git-backed ticket store through MCP tools, supporting operations like ticket creation, claiming, and transitions.4Apache 2.0
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityDmaintenanceEnables AI agents to manage Linear workspace resources such as issues, projects, teams, cycles, and comments via Streamable HTTP MCP, with LLM-optimized tools and batch operations.280 npmMIT
- FlicenseAqualityBmaintenanceEnables reading and managing Linear issues by human-readable ID, with tools for searching, creating, updating, commenting, and resolving teams, states, labels, and assignees by name.11-
- FlicenseNot gradedqualityDmaintenanceEnables AI agents to manage a file-backed ticketing system directly within a local repository using a structured state machine and directory hierarchy. It enforces strict markdown schemas and provides specialized tools for claiming tasks, appending work logs, and validating ticket metadata.-
TDQS
Scored across 17 tools
Most tools target distinct resources or actions, but set_state and comment both can carry description patches, creating a slight overlap. claim and check_claim are complementary yet clearly separated by intent and timing. Overall, an agent can usually tell them apart from descriptions.
Names are mostly snake_case and follow verb_noun for actions (set_state, list_issues, create_issue), but noun phrases like description_history and notifications, plus standalone verbs like claim and comment, break the pattern. Still readable and predictable within tool categories.
17 tools is slightly above the typical 3-15 range, but the server's strict, multi-step workflow justifies each tool with a distinct operation. No obvious redundancy; borderline heavy but reasonable for this domain.
The surface covers ticket creation, reading, description state changes, comments, fields, status, claims, notifications, and supporting lists. Missing delete ticket and comment editing operations, but the core agent lifecycle is complete with workarounds for minor gaps.