amazon-in-mcp
This server lets your LLM search, retrieve, and analyze products on Amazon.in (India) through direct HTML scraping — no API keys required.
Search for products (
search_amazon_in): Search by keyword and get ranked listings with price, MRP, rating, review count, stock status, delivery info, and Prime eligibility. Supports pagination, filtering sponsored listings, and up to 20 results per query. Also returns two convenience picks:Cheapest in stock: the lowest-priced available listing
Best value: scored by
rating × log10(reviews+10) / √price(requires ≥10 reviews)
Get full product details (
get_product): Fetch comprehensive info for a specific product by ASIN or Amazon.in URL, including price, MRP, discount %, rating, reviews, stock status, feature bullets, brand, seller, delivery details, and a Keepa price-history chart URL.Generate price history links (
price_history_link): Instantly construct a Keepa.com chart URL for any Amazon.in product by ASIN or URL — no network call needed.No API keys or accounts required: Operates by scraping public Amazon.in pages with rotating user agents, retries on bot-check pages, and in-memory caching.
Configurable: Supports environment variables for proxy (
AMAZON_IN_PROXY), cache TTL (AMAZON_IN_CACHE_TTL_MS), and affiliate tag (AMAZON_IN_AFFILIATE_TAG).Automatic routing: Built-in server instructions allow MCP-capable clients to automatically route Amazon.in queries to the appropriate tools.
Provides tools to search and retrieve product details from Amazon.in, including price, ratings, and stock information.
What it does
Three tools your LLM can call against amazon.in:
Tool | What it returns |
| Ranked listings + two convenience picks: cheapest in stock and best value (rating × log10(reviews) / √price). |
| Full product detail — price, MRP, discount, rating, reviews, stock, bullets, brand, seller, delivery |
| A Keepa.com chart URL for the amazon.in domain. No network call. |
No API keys. No accounts. Runs locally over stdio. Direct HTML scraping with rotating user agents and retry on bot-check pages.
Related MCP server: Amazon & Flipkart MCP Server
Quick start
1. Install (Claude Code):
git clone https://github.com/justadityaraj/amazon-in-mcp.git
cd amazon-in-mcp && npm install && npm run build
claude mcp add amazon-in -- node "$PWD/dist/index.js"2. Restart your MCP client (Claude Code, Cursor, Claude Desktop, etc.)
3. Ask:
"Find me a good 1TB external SSD on amazon.in under ₹10,000. Best value pick."
Your LLM will call search_amazon_in, rank by value, and hand back a real product with current price and a Keepa link for price history.
What it looks like
A real call to search_amazon_in("wireless mouse", max_results=3) returns:
{
"query": "wireless mouse",
"page": 1,
"total_results": 3,
"results": [
{
"asin": "B0CQRNWJM2",
"title": "ZEBRONICS Blanc Slim Wireless Mouse...",
"url": "https://www.amazon.in/dp/B0CQRNWJM2?tag=artech-21",
"price_inr": 423,
"mrp_inr": 799,
"rating": 4.0,
"review_count": 7801,
"in_stock": true,
"delivery": "FREE delivery Tomorrow",
"price_history_url": "https://keepa.com/#!product/12-B0CQRNWJM2"
}
],
"cheapest_in_stock": { "asin": "...", "price_inr": 199, "...": "..." },
"best_value": { "asin": "...", "rating": 4.3, "...": "..." }
}get_product adds bullets[], brand, seller, discount_percent, availability.
Configure your MCP client
claude mcp add amazon-in -- node /absolute/path/to/amazon-in-mcp/dist/index.jsEdit ~/Library/Application Support/Claude/claude_desktop_config.json:
{
"mcpServers": {
"amazon-in": {
"command": "node",
"args": ["/absolute/path/to/amazon-in-mcp/dist/index.js"]
}
}
}Same JSON config as Claude Desktop. Drop it into the client's MCP settings file.
Configuration
All optional. Set these in the env block of your MCP client config; defaults preserve the original behavior.
Env var | Default | Purpose |
|
| Amazon Associates tag on emitted URLs. |
|
| Lifetime of the in-memory page cache (ms). |
| unset | HTTP/HTTPS proxy URL for all requests, e.g. |
Example — route through a proxy and shorten the cache to 30 s:
{
"mcpServers": {
"amazon-in": {
"command": "node",
"args": ["/path/to/dist/index.js"],
"env": {
"AMAZON_IN_PROXY": "http://user:pass@proxy.example:8080",
"AMAZON_IN_CACHE_TTL_MS": "30000"
}
}
}
}Automatic routing (no need to say "use the Amazon MCP")
Once installed, the server tells your client to reach for these tools on its own. It ships MCP server instructions (returned in the initialize handshake) that instruct the model to use search_amazon_in / get_product by default for any amazon.in shopping, price, availability, or reviews question — including when you just paste an amazon.in link or an ASIN. The tool descriptions carry the same trigger keywords as a fallback for clients that read tool descriptions but not server instructions.
So you can ask "find me a mechanical keyboard under 3000" or paste a product link and the client routes to this server without you naming it. Note this is model-level guidance surfaced by the host (Claude Code, Claude Desktop, Cursor, …), not a hard protocol guarantee — a client that ignores server instructions and tool descriptions won't be forced to route.
Image search
The server intentionally doesn't accept image input — keeps it provider-agnostic. Instead, paste the image into your LLM client, ask it to describe the product, and it'll call search_amazon_in with the right keywords automatically. Works the same in every MCP-capable client.
How "best value" is scored
Among in-stock listings with at least 10 reviews:
$$ \text{score} = \frac{\text{rating} \times \log_{10}(\text{reviews} + 10)}{\sqrt{\text{price}}} $$
The highest score wins. cheapest_in_stock is just the lowest price_inr among in-stock items — useful when you want raw cheapness instead of balance.
Robustness
UA rotation | 5 modern desktop UAs (Chrome / Safari / Firefox on Mac / Win / Linux) |
Retries | 3 attempts, exponential backoff on 5xx, 429, and bot-check pages |
Bot detection | Scans first 8 KB for known CAPTCHA / robot markers |
Timeout | 20 s per request |
Caching | Successful pages cached in memory for 90 s (per URL) to skip duplicate fetches; tune with |
Proxy | Optional — set |
State | None persisted. Stdio, no cookies, no session — the cache is a short-lived, in-process buffer only |
Expect ~1–5% of requests to fail with a bot-check during heavy use. Wait 30–60 seconds and retry, run from a different network, or set AMAZON_IN_PROXY.
How this project is funded
By default, amazon.in URLs returned by this server include the author's Amazon Associates tag (artech-21). If you (or your LLM) click through and buy something, the author earns a small commission. You pay the same price. This is the only way the project stays free, MIT, and actively maintained.
Override or disable anytime with the AMAZON_IN_AFFILIATE_TAG env var:
Value | Behavior |
unset | Author's tag ( |
| Your own Amazon Associates tag |
| No tag, raw amazon.in URLs |
Example — your own tag:
{
"mcpServers": {
"amazon-in": {
"command": "node",
"args": ["/path/to/dist/index.js"],
"env": { "AMAZON_IN_AFFILIATE_TAG": "yourtag-21" }
}
}
}Roadmap
Publish to npm so install becomes
npx -y amazon-in-mcp-serverOptional Keepa API support (user-supplied key) for real price-history data
Filter helpers —
min_rating,min_reviews,under_priceSmoke-test suite with cached HTML fixtures
Development
npm install
npm run dev # tsx watch
npm run build # tsc → dist/
npm start # node dist/index.jsTest interactively with the MCP Inspector:
npx @modelcontextprotocol/inspector node dist/index.jsProject layout:
src/
index.ts # MCP server + 3 tool registrations
scraper.ts # fetch with UA rotation, retry, bot-check, proxy, cache
parse.ts # cheerio selectors for search + product pages
cache.ts # in-memory TTL + LRU cache
constants.ts # UAs, headers, tuning constants, affiliate/proxy/cache config
types.ts # SearchResultItem, ProductDetailDisclaimer
Fetches publicly accessible amazon.in pages for personal research and assistant use. Does not bypass authentication, paywalls, or CAPTCHAs — when Amazon serves a bot-check the tool stops and reports the error.
You are responsible for using this in line with Amazon's Terms of Service and any local laws. No warranty about uptime, accuracy, or fitness for any purpose. DOM selectors are best-effort and may break when Amazon updates its layout. PRs welcome.
License
MIT © Aditya Raj Singh
Issues, bug reports, and selector fixes welcome — Amazon's DOM shifts every few months, so this will break occasionally and need community help to keep current.
Available Tools
3 toolsget_productGet Amazon.in Product DetailARead-onlyIdempotent
Fetch a single amazon.in product's details by ASIN or URL.
Use this by default whenever the user pastes an amazon.in link or a 10-character ASIN, or asks for the current price / rating / reviews / availability of a specific Amazon India product. Prefer it over web search or training-data guesses.
Scrapes the product page and returns price, MRP, discount %, rating, review count, availability, bullets, brand, seller, delivery info, and a Keepa price-history URL.
Args:
asin_or_url (string): plain 10-char ASIN (e.g., "B0BDHWDR12") or any amazon.in product URL containing /dp/
Returns: JSON with schema: { "asin": string, "title": string, "url": string, "image": string, "price_inr": number, "price_display": string, "mrp_inr": number, "discount_percent": number, "rating": number, "review_count": number, "in_stock": boolean, "availability": string, "bullets": string[], "brand": string, "seller": string, "delivery": string, "price_history_url": string }
Error handling:
"Could not extract ASIN" → input was not a valid ASIN or amazon.in URL
"Bot-check page" → retry after a delay
| Name | Required | Description | Default |
|---|---|---|---|
| asin_or_url | Yes | Amazon.in ASIN (10 chars) or any product URL containing /dp/<ASIN> |
TDQS
Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?
Annotations already indicate read-only, idempotent, open-world. Description adds that it scrapes the product page, returns specific fields, and mentions 'Bot-check page' retry. Fully discloses scraping behavior and error conditions.
Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.
Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?
Well-structured with sections for purpose, usage, args, returns, error handling. Front-loaded with main purpose. Each sentence adds value, no fluff. ~200 words appropriate for detail provided.
Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.
Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?
No output schema, but description provides a full JSON schema of the return value. Covers error cases. With one well-documented parameter, description is complete for correct invocation.
Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.
Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?
Input schema has one parameter with description. Tool description explains parameter format (plain ASIN or URL containing /dp/<ASIN>), examples, and constraints. Adds meaning beyond schema's basic description.
Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.
Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?
The description clearly states 'Fetch a single amazon.in product's details by ASIN or URL.' It specifies the source (Amazon India) and identifiers. Distinguishes from siblings by recommending it over web search or training-data guesses.
Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.
Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?
Explicit guidance: 'Use this by default whenever the user pastes an amazon.in link or a 10-character ASIN, or asks for the current price / rating / reviews / availability.' Also says 'Prefer it over web search or training-data guesses.' Includes error handling for invalid inputs.
Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.
price_history_linkPrice History Link (Keepa)ARead-onlyIdempotent
Build a Keepa.com price-history URL for an amazon.in ASIN. No network call.
Keepa renders historical price charts in the browser using the format keepa.com/#!product/12-, where 12 is the amazon.in domain code. This tool is offline — just a deterministic URL builder.
Args:
asin_or_url (string): plain ASIN or amazon.in URL containing /dp/
Returns: JSON { "asin": string, "price_history_url": string }
| Name | Required | Description | Default |
|---|---|---|---|
| asin_or_url | Yes | ASIN or amazon.in URL — Keepa link is built for the amazon.in domain |
TDQS
Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?
Annotations already declare readOnlyHint, idempotentHint, and destructiveHint. The description adds valuable context: 'no network call', 'deterministic URL builder', and explains the URL format with domain code 12. No contradictions with annotations.
Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.
Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?
The description is concise with two short paragraphs plus structured Args/Returns. Every sentence is necessary and informative. No fluff.
Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.
Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?
Given the tool's simplicity (1 param, no output schema, no nested objects, clear annotations), the description covers all needed aspects: purpose, behavior, input format, and output structure. Nothing missing.
Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.
Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?
The schema description coverage is 100%, so baseline is 3. The description adds format details (plain ASIN or amazon.in URL containing /dp/<ASIN>) but largely repeats the schema's description. Marginal additional value.
Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.
Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?
The description clearly states 'Build a Keepa.com price-history URL for an amazon.in ASIN', which is a specific verb and resource. It distinguishes from sibling tools (get_product, search_amazon_in) by noting it is a URL builder, not a data fetcher.
Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.
Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?
The description explains it is an offline, deterministic URL builder with no network call, implying use cases where a price history link is needed without making an API call. However, it does not explicitly state when not to use or mention alternatives.
Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.
search_amazon_inSearch Amazon.inARead-onlyIdempotent
Search amazon.in (Amazon India) for products by keyword and return ranked listings.
Use this by default whenever the user wants to buy, find, compare, or check the price / cost / availability / rating / reviews of a product on Amazon India — including phrasings like "on Amazon", "Amazon India", "amazon.in", "find me a…", "cheapest…", or "what's the price of…". Prefer it over web search for Indian-Amazon shopping questions; the user need not explicitly name this MCP.
This tool scrapes the public amazon.in search page (no API key needed). It returns a normalised list of results plus two convenience picks:
cheapest_in_stock: lowest price among listings showing stock
best_value: weighted score = rating × log10(reviews+10) / sqrt(price), requires >=10 reviews
Args:
query (string, 2-200 chars): search keywords
max_results (int, 1-20, default 5): number of listings to return
page (int, 1-20, default 1): which result page to fetch; use to look past page 1
include_sponsored (bool, default false): include ad listings
Returns: JSON with schema: { "query": string, "page": number, // which result page was fetched "total_results": number, // listings parsed from this page (pre-slice) "returned": number, // how many are in results[] after applying max_results "results": [ { "asin": string, "title": string, "url": string, "image": string, "price_inr": number, "price_display": string, "mrp_inr": number, "rating": number, "review_count": number, "prime": boolean, "sponsored": boolean, "in_stock": boolean, "delivery": string, "price_history_url": string } ], "cheapest_in_stock": , "best_value": }
Error handling:
"Amazon served a bot-check page" → wait 30-60s and retry
"Failed to reach amazon.in" → transient network or throttling
| Name | Required | Description | Default |
|---|---|---|---|
| page | No | Result page to fetch (1-based). Amazon shows ~16-24 organic listings per page; use this to look past the first page. Default 1. | |
| query | Yes | Keyword search query (e.g., 'bluetooth speaker under 2000') | |
| max_results | No | Maximum listings to return (1-20). Default 5. | |
| include_sponsored | No | Include sponsored / ad listings. Defaults to false. |
TDQS
Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?
Annotations already declare readOnlyHint, idempotentHint, and non-destructive. The description adds that it scrapes the public search page (no API key), error handling details, and the computation of convenience picks (cheapest_in_stock, best_value) with formulas. No contradictions.
Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.
Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?
Well-structured with clear sections: purpose, usage guidelines, internal details, args, output schema, error handling. Front-loaded with purpose and usage. Slightly lengthy but each part is justified. Could be more concise by moving output schema to a separate field.
Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.
Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?
Thorough description covering all aspects: purpose, usage, parameter details, output structure, error handling, convenience picks. No output schema field exists, but the description provides full JSON schema. Appropriate for a search tool with pagination and computed fields.
Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.
Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?
Input schema covers 100% of parameters with descriptions. The description adds context like query length limits, page usage explanation, and the two computed fields (cheapest_in_stock, best_value) which are derived but not parameters. Baseline is 3; this adds extra value.
Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.
Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?
The description clearly states it searches Amazon India for products by keyword and returns ranked listings. It distinguishes from sibling tools 'get_product' and 'price_history_link' by focusing on general search. The verb 'search' and resource 'amazon.in' are specific.
Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.
Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?
Explicitly says 'Use this by default' for various shopping intents and gives example phrasings. It also states preference over web search and that the user need not name the MCP. This is comprehensive guidance.
Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.
Tool Schema Changelog
Recent tool additions, removals, and schema changes observed during successful MCP inspections.
1 tool update
v0.1.3- Changed
search_amazon_in1 field changed- added
Input schema / properties / pageAdded value: +{ + "default": 1, + "description": "Result page to fetch (1-based). Amazon shows ~16-24 organic listings per page; use this to look past the first page. Default 1.", + "maximum": 20, + "minimum": 1, + "type": "integer" +}
3 tool updates
v0.1.0- First observed
get_product - First observed
price_history_link - First observed
search_amazon_in
TDQS
Scored across 3 tools
Each tool has a clearly distinct purpose: get_product fetches details for a specific ASIN, search_amazon_in handles keyword queries, and price_history_link builds a static URL. No overlap in functionality.
Naming is mostly consistent with verb_noun pattern (get_product, search_amazon_in), but price_history_link uses a noun_noun pattern. The deviation is minor and all names are clear.
Three tools is on the lower end but appropriate for a focused product info server. The set covers the essential operations: search, single product detail, and price history URL generation.
The tool surface covers the main workflows (search and detail fetch). A minor gap is that price_history_link only returns a URL rather than actual price history data, but the overall coverage is solid for the stated purpose.
Maintenance
Related MCP Connectors
Search 77,000+ MCP servers ranked by real adoption data to find the right one for any task.
Find the right MCP server for your task. 4,500+ servers ranked by community trust.
Price benchmarks, alternatives & daily price history across 17,000+ AI agents and MCP servers.
Amazon product API & MCP server: search, prices, reviews, sellers, deals, and ASIN lookup by Canopy.
Related MCP Servers
AlicenseNot gradedqualityDmaintenanceMCP server for scraping product prices, offers, reviews, and details from Amazon, Google Shopping, Bol.com, and Coolblue via natural language commands, with spend-cap protections.9 npm1MIT- FlicenseNot gradedqualityCmaintenanceLightweight MCP server for interacting with Amazon and Flipkart search and authentication components.-
- FlicenseNot gradedqualityBmaintenanceMCP server that enables AI agents to search and compare products and generate Amazon affiliate purchase links.-
- FlicenseNot gradedqualityCmaintenanceMCP server for automating personal Amazon.in and Flipkart accounts via browser sessions, enabling product search, cart management, and guarded checkout.-