axur-mcp
Related Servers
Alternatives to axur-mcp
No user-submitted related servers found.
Related Servers
- FlicenseNot gradedqualityDmaintenanceRead-only MCP server for querying Movidesk tickets through the public Movidesk API.9 npm-
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityAmaintenanceAn MCP server for the RocketCyber Managed SOC platform that provides read-only access to security data including incidents, agents, and events. It enables users to monitor and query security information through 10 specialized tools and resources.Apache 2.0
- FlicenseNot gradedqualityCmaintenanceMCP server for ticketing automation that exposes tools to create, search, and update IT helpdesk tickets, with metrics tracking.-
- FlicenseNot gradedqualityBmaintenanceMCP server for ConnectSecure vulnerability management, exposing 285 read-only tools to query assets, vulnerabilities, Active Directory, and more via natural language.-
- AlicenseAqualityBmaintenanceA read-only MCP server for Archery that enables secure instance query, ticket management, and restricted SQL execution through AI clients.101MIT
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityCmaintenanceMCP server for investigating cloud incidents and managing approvals. Provides read-only tools to list incidents, investigate incidents, and list approvals, keeping remediation behind human approval.MIT
TDQS
Scored across 3 tools
The tools are mostly distinct: 'tickets' handles search, list, and summary retrieval; 'ticket_details' provides deep single-ticket information; 'ticket_stats' covers statistics. However, there is potential overlap between 'tickets' get action and 'ticket_details', as both retrieve ticket info, but descriptions suggest different detail levels.
All tool names follow a consistent 'ticket_' prefix with descriptive suffixes: 'tickets', 'ticket_details', 'ticket_stats'. The naming is predictable and uses snake_case uniformly.
With only 3 tools, the count is at the lower borderline. While the 'tickets' tool bundles multiple actions (list, get, bulk_get, history, types), the overall set feels slightly thin for a platform that likely involves CRUD and lifecycle management.
The tools are purely read-only (retrieve, search, stats). Missing operations to create, update, delete, or take action on tickets (e.g., takedown) is a significant gap for a security platform, limiting agent ability to respond to threats.