Skip to main content
Glama
jus1-c

Forensics Utils MCP Server

by jus1-c

Related Servers

Alternatives to Forensics Utils MCP Server

No user-submitted related servers found.

    Related Servers

    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      D
      maintenance
      An MCP server that enables AI agents to analyze executable files using Detect It Easy (DIE), providing capabilities to examine file structures, detect packers, compilers, and gather other forensic information.
      13
      MIT
    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      D
      maintenance
      A local MCP server that wraps common forensic command-line tools for CTF/forensics competitions into MCP tools, enabling automated analysis of disk images, memory dumps, network captures, SQLite databases, archives, and steganography.
      1
      MIT
    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      A
      maintenance
      An enterprise-grade MCP server for AI-powered reverse engineering. Enables AI agents to perform comprehensive binary analysis through natural language commands.
      201
      MIT
    • F
      license
      A
      quality
      D
      maintenance
      MCP server for security analysis using VirusTotal API, enabling AI assistants to analyze URLs, files, IP addresses, and domains with automatic relationship fetching.
      8
      1
      -
    • F
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      D
      maintenance
      A powerful filesystem MCP server for AI agents with extensive system access, including filesystem operations, shell execution, Windows tools, reverse engineering, code intelligence, and agent orchestration.
      1
      -
    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      C
      maintenance
      A high-performance MCP Server for Disk Forensics that enables AI agents to analyze disk images through the Model Context Protocol.
      2
      MIT

    TDQS

    B3.2/5.0

    Scored across 51 tools

    Disambiguation3/5

    Most tools have distinct targets, but there are several easily confused pairs: parse vs decrypt cookies for both Chromium and Firefox, session vs session storage, and the generic get_cache_stats vs browser-specific cache parsing tools. These ambiguities could lead an agent to select the wrong tool.

    Naming Consistency4/5

    The majority of tools follow a clear snake_case pattern with domain prefixes (vt_, chromium_, firefox_), but the cache utilities (get_cache_stats, clear_cache) lack the _tool suffix, and some tools use verb-first naming (extract_exif_tool) while others use tool-first (binwalk_scan_tool). Overall, the naming is mostly consistent and readable.

    Tool Count2/5

    With 51 tools, the server far exceeds the threshold where a toolset feels heavy. While the breadth of browser forensics explains many tools, the granularity (e.g., separate tools for each artifact type in each browser) makes the server difficult to navigate, and the presence of two unrelated cache utilities adds unnecessary bloat.

    Completeness4/5

    The toolset provides comprehensive coverage for file analysis (hashing, EXIF, strings, binwalk, DIE) and VirusTotal interactions, and very thorough browser forensics for Chromium and Firefox, including parsing, decryption, and profile summaries. Minor gaps exist, such as no direct memory/disk forensics and no ability to add VirusTotal comments, but these are outside the apparent core scope.

    Maintenance

    ActivityStale
    ResponsivenessNo issues