Liechtenstein Legal Research MCP Server
Server Configuration
Describes the environment variables required to run the server.
| Name | Required | Description | Default |
|---|---|---|---|
No arguments | |||
Instructions
Guidance the server publishes about itself, which clients place ahead of the tool catalog so the model reads it before choosing anything.
Official-source legal research, multi-tier judicial hierarchy search (First Instance, Regional/Cantonal/Appellate, and Supreme/Constitutional courts), and citation verification MCP server for Liechtenstein (LI).
Capabilities
Features and capabilities supported by this server
Protocol revision2025-11-25
| Capability | Details |
|---|---|
| tools | {
"listChanged": true
} |
| logging | {} |
| prompts | {
"listChanged": true
} |
| resources | {
"subscribe": false,
"listChanged": true
} |
Tools
Functions exposed to the LLM to take actions
| Name | Description |
|---|---|
| search_legislationA | Search Liechtenstein (LI) national legislation (statutes, acts, codes, regulations) via Lilex - Liechtensteinische Gesetzessammlung (gesetze.li) and European/International legal registries. |
| search_case_lawC | Search Liechtenstein (LI) court decisions and binding precedents via Liechtensteinische Gerichte (gerichte.li) & Staatsgerichtshof (Supported courts: Oberster Gerichtshof (OGH), Staatsgerichtshof (StGH), Verwaltungsgerichtshof (VGH)). |
| get_legal_document_markdownA | Retrieve full Markdown text of a legislation document or court judgment from Liechtenstein (LI) by its URL or official identifier. |
| list_court_hierarchyA | Return the complete step-by-step multi-tier judicial hierarchy for Liechtenstein (LI): Tier 1 (First Instance / Trial / Municipal / District Courts), Tier 2 (Regional / Cantonal / County / Appellate Courts), Tier 3 (Supreme / Cassation / Constitutional Courts), and all official court sub-portals. |
| search_tiered_court_decisionsA | Search court decisions in Liechtenstein (LI) filtered by specific judicial tier or regional/cantonal/appellate court. Supports Tier 1 (first_instance), Tier 2 (appellate_regional — including Cantonal/Regional/County/Circuit courts), and Tier 3 (supreme_constitutional), or a specific sub-portal key from list_court_hierarchy. |
| verify_citationA | No-Hallucination Citation Verifier for Liechtenstein (LI). Validates format and live existence of legal citations (e.g., 'LES 2024, 15 or LGBl. 2024 Nr. 10') against official Liechtenstein and ECLI/ELI registries to prevent AI-hallucinated citations. |
Prompts
Interactive templates invoked by user choice
| Name | Description |
|---|---|
No prompts | |
Resources
Contextual data attached and managed by the client
| Name | Description |
|---|---|
No resources | |
TDQS
Scored across 6 tools
Most tools target distinct actions/resources: hierarchy listing, legislation search, full-text retrieval, and citation verification are clearly separate. The only notable overlap is between search_case_law and search_tiered_court_decisions, which both search court decisions; descriptions help by framing one as tier-filtered, but agents may still hesitate between them.
All tool names follow a consistent snake_case verb_noun pattern: list_court_hierarchy, search_legislation, search_case_law, get_legal_document_markdown, search_tiered_court_decisions, verify_citation. The convention is predictable and easy to scan.
Six tools is well-scoped for a legal research server. Each tool covers a distinct part of the workflow: hierarchy discovery, legislation search, case-law search, tiered case-law search, full-text retrieval, and citation verification.
The surface covers the key legal-research lifecycle: understanding court structure, finding legislation, finding case law by court/tier, retrieving full documents, and verifying citations. No obvious operational gap remains for the stated purpose.