Germany Legal Research MCP Server
# Germany Legal Research MCP Server (`de-legal-mcp`)
Model Context Protocol (MCP) server providing direct, read-only access to **Germany (DE)** legislation, multi-tier judicial decisions (First Instance, Regional/Cantonal/Appellate, and Supreme/Constitutional courts), and statutory citation verification for Claude Desktop, Cursor, and Antigravity.
---
## Quick Desktop Setup (No Command Line Required)
This package includes a graphical installer for legal practitioners who prefer not to use terminal commands or edit JSON configuration files manually.
1. **Download:** Click **`<> Code`** at the top right of this repository, select **`Download ZIP`**, and extract the folder to your computer.
2. **Run the Setup Utility:**
- **Windows:** Double-click `Click_Here_To_Install_Windows.bat`
- **macOS:** Double-click `Click_Here_To_Install_Mac.command`
3. **Connect:** Click **Install & Connect Automatically** in the setup window and restart Claude Desktop.
**System Integrity Note:** The setup utility operates strictly in read-only mode with respect to your personal files and documents. It installs an isolated Python environment inside the extracted folder and registers the server entry in your AI client configuration.
---
## Multi-Tier Judicial Hierarchy & Official Sources
This server indexes and queries decisions across the full judicial hierarchy of **Germany**, allowing practitioners to filter research by procedural stage:
| Judicial Tier | Covered Courts & Tribunals |
|:---|:---|
| **Tier 1 — First Instance** | Amtsgerichte (AG), Landgerichte (LG), Verwaltungsgerichte (VG), Arbeitsgerichte (ArbG), Sozialgerichte (SG) & Finanzgerichte (FG) |
| **Tier 2 — Regional / Cantonal / Appellate** | 24 Oberlandesgerichte (OLG / KG Berlin), Oberverwaltungsgerichte (OVG / VGH), Landesarbeitsgerichte (LAG) & Landessozialgerichte (LSG) across 16 Bundesländer |
| **Tier 3 — Supreme & Constitutional** | Bundesverfassungsgericht (BVerfG), Bundesgerichtshof (BGH), Bundesverwaltungsgericht (BVerwG), Bundesfinanzhof (BFH), Bundesarbeitsgericht (BAG) & Bundessozialgericht (BSG) |
### Primary Legal Portals
- **National Legislation Registry:** Gesetze im Internet (gesetze-im-internet.de) & Rechtsinformationen des Bundes (`https://www.gesetze-im-internet.de`)
- **Multi-Tier Case Law Database:** OpenLegalData.io (AG/LG/OLG/Federal) & Rechtsprechung im Internet + 16 Landesrechtsprechungsdatenbanken (`https://de.openlegaldata.io/api/cases/`)
- **Supported Citation Format Example:** `ECLI:DE:BGH:2024:100124UVIII_ZR_12.23.0 or BGB § 433`
### Indexed Court & Regional Sub-Portals
| Sub-Portal Identifier (`sub_court`) | Official Endpoint / Registry |
|:---|:---|
| `openlegaldata_all_tiers` | `https://de.openlegaldata.io/api/cases/` |
| `rechtsprechung_bund` | `https://www.rechtsprechung-im-internet.de` |
---
## Available MCP Tools
| Tool | Description |
|:---|:---|
| `search_legislation` | Searches enacted statutes, codes, decrees, and official gazette publications in Germany. |
| `search_case_law` | Searches national jurisprudence and European/ECLI-linked judgments for Germany. |
| `search_tiered_court_decisions` | Filters case law specifically by judicial instance (`first_instance`, `appellate_regional`, `supreme_constitutional`) or regional/cantonal court key (`sub_court`). |
| `list_court_hierarchy` | Returns the complete 3-tier court structure and registered sub-portal endpoints for Germany. |
| `get_legal_document_markdown` | Retrieves full statutory or judicial texts and converts them into clean Markdown. |
| `verify_citation` | Validates statutory and case law citations against official registries. |
---
<details>
<summary><b>Manual Configuration for Developers (Optional)</b></summary>
```json
{
"mcpServers": {
"de-legal-mcp": {
"command": "uvx",
"args": [
"--from",
"git+https://github.com/jurisatlas/de-legal-mcp",
"de-legal-mcp"
]
}
}
}
```
</details>
TDQS
Scored across 6 tools
Most tools target distinct actions/resources, but search_case_law and search_tiered_court_decisions overlap in purpose since both search court decisions. The tiered variant is clearly a filtered specialization, so descriptions help, but an agent may still hesitate between them.
All tool names use consistent snake_case with a verb_noun pattern (search_*, get_*, list_*, verify_*). Minor additions like 'markdown' or 'tiered' do not break the convention.
Six tools is well-scoped for a legal research server, covering search, retrieval, hierarchy, and verification without bloat. Each tool has a clear role in the workflow.
The surface covers core legal research workflows: legislation search, case law search, full-text retrieval, court hierarchy, tiered decisions, and citation verification. Minor gaps exist, such as no explicit date-range filtering or direct citation-to-document retrieval, but agents can work around these.