Skip to main content
Glama
jupiter-ai0211

project-notes MCP Server

by jupiter-ai0211
OverviewSchemaSourceRelated ServersDiscussionsAdmin
JavaScript
Local

Related Servers

Alternatives to project-notes MCP Server

No user-submitted related servers found.

    Related Servers

    • Curator

      Prodero
      A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      B
      maintenance
      Enables AI coding agents to persist and retrieve durable project knowledge across coding sessions, capturing decisions, conventions, lessons and reusable skills through ordinary chat requests. It supports searching, editing and reviewing saved items, and promoting local notes into Git-shareable versioned knowledge alongside repository changes.
      397 npm
      MIT

    • memory-vault

      JohnXu22786
      A
      license
      A
      quality
      B
      maintenance
      Provides cross-session persistent memory for coding agents via MCP tools to store, retrieve, and manage notes with hybrid keyword/semantic search and automatic deduplication.
      8
      340 npm
      MIT

    • Memory MCP

      EtienneBBeaulac
      A
      license
      A
      quality
      C
      maintenance
      Gives AI coding agents persistent, evolving knowledge about a codebase, enabling them to store and retrieve observations about architecture, conventions, gotchas, and recent work context.
      10
      31 npm
      3
      MIT
    Deploy Server
    Shareable, User-Owned Context BackendPeople, applications, and agents read, write, and coordinate together in one context lake. Reach it over MCP, a CLI, a Python SDK, or REST.fulcradynamics.comAd

    TDQS

    C2.8/5.0

    Scored across 2 tools

    Disambiguation5/5

    The two tools are clearly distinct: one creates notes, the other searches them. There is no ambiguity in their purposes.

    Naming Consistency4/5

    Both tools follow a verb_noun pattern, but one uses singular 'note' and the other plural 'notes', creating a minor inconsistency. The pattern is otherwise predictable and readable.

    Tool Count3/5

    With only 2 tools, the server feels thin for a project-notes domain. The count matches the minimal add/search functionality, but it borders on insufficient for a well-scoped tool set.

    Completeness2/5

    The domain is note management, but the surface only supports adding and searching. Missing core operations like getting a specific note, updating, deleting, or listing all notes creates significant gaps that will force agents to work around missing functionality.

    Maintenance

    ActivityInactive
    ResponsivenessNo issues

    Resources