Skip to main content
Glama

Related Servers

Alternatives to hwpx-mcp

No user-submitted related servers found.

    Related Servers

    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      C
      maintenance
      Enables AI agents to read and edit Korean HWP/HWPX documents, including converting Hanyang PUA old-Hangul characters to Unicode jamo, diagnosing unsupported characters, and preserving arae-a, panch'im, yet-ieung, expanded jamo, filler and side dots. Also supports HWPX search-and-replace, template filling, paragraph/table/image/style editing, page rendering to SVG/HTML, and creating new HWPX documents.
      MIT
    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      D
      maintenance
      Enables AI assistants to control Hancom's HWP/HWPX documents (Korean word processor) via COM interface on Windows, supporting creation, editing, formatting, and export.
      MIT
    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      B
      maintenance
      Enables AI models to read, create, and edit Korean HWPX documents with advanced support for tables, paragraphs, styles, and images. It features enhanced stability through atomic file writing and smart layout recalculation to prevent document corruption.
      34
      MIT
    • A
      license
      A
      quality
      Not graded
      maintenance
      Enables reading, editing, and creating Korean HWPX documents through python-hwpx library. Supports document creation, paragraph/table/image insertion, metadata management, and workspace-restricted file operations with automatic backup functionality.
      8
      MIT
    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      B
      maintenance
      Enables Claude to create, edit, mail-merge, convert and preview documents by driving a locally installed WordCraft engine headless, covering DOCX, PDF, ODT, RTF, HTML, Markdown and LaTeX. Supports templates, tables, images, comments, tracked changes, merge fields from CSV/XLSX/ODS, page rendering and folder-wide batch processing.
      Apache 2.0

    TDQS

    B3.3/5.0

    Scored across 22 tools

    Disambiguation4/5

    Each tool maps to a distinct resource or subsystem (table, image, shape, style, field, memo, etc.), and read vs text split extraction from mutation clearly. The catch-all xml tool overlaps conceptually with every semantic tool, creating some boundary ambiguity, but overall the roles are distinguishable.

    Naming Consistency5/5

    Every tool name is a consistent single-word lowercase noun (page, text, table, image, style, field, memo), with actions expressed uniformly as parameters. The pattern is entirely predictable throughout.

    Tool Count4/5

    22 tools is on the heavier side, but the domain (a full word-processor document model) genuinely spans text, formatting, tables, embedded objects, fields, and rendering. Each tool earns its place as a subsystem, though a few could conceivably be consolidated.

    Completeness5/5

    Coverage is comprehensive: document lifecycle, text editing, char/para/style formatting, tables, equations, images, shapes, charts, notes, links, TOC, fields, memos, page setup, track changes, render/convert. No obvious lifecycle gaps (create/read/update/delete exist across resources).

    Maintenance

    ActivityMaintained
    ResponsivenessNo issues