search_c411

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

No annotations are provided, so the description carries full burden for behavioral disclosure. It states nothing about network requirements, rate limits, authentication, idempotency, or whether results are cached. The minimal description offers no behavioral context beyond the basic action.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

The single sentence 'Search for torrents on c411.org' is appropriately sized with zero redundancy. It is front-loaded with the action and contains no filler text, making it efficiently scannable.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

Given the 100% parameter schema coverage and presence of an output schema, the description does not need to elaborate on return values or parameter details. However, it lacks mention of the typical workflow (search → download/info) that would complete the context for an agent selecting among the four related tools.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

With 100% schema description coverage, the input schema fully documents all 5 parameters (query, sortBy, sortOrder, page, perPage). The description adds no additional semantic information beyond what the schema provides, which warrants the baseline score for high-coverage schemas.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description states a specific verb ('Search') and resource ('torrents on c411.org'), clearly identifying the tool's function. However, it does not explicitly differentiate from siblings like 'get_c411_torrent_info' (which retrieves specific torrent details by ID rather than searching).

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

The description provides no guidance on when to use this tool versus alternatives. It fails to mention that search results are typically prerequisite for using sibling tools like 'download_c411_torrent' or 'get_c411_torrent_info', or that this is the entry point for discovery.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.