frontmatter_get
Retrieve YAML frontmatter from the current document to access metadata like title, tags, or custom fields.
Instructions
Returns the YAML frontmatter of the document
Input Schema
| Name | Required | Description | Default |
|---|---|---|---|
No arguments | |||
Retrieve YAML frontmatter from the current document to access metadata like title, tags, or custom fields.
Returns the YAML frontmatter of the document
| Name | Required | Description | Default |
|---|---|---|---|
No arguments | |||
Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?
No annotations provided. Description only states it returns frontmatter, missing details like read-only nature, required document state, or error conditions.
Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.
Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?
Single sentence, front-loaded, no extraneous words. Perfectly concise.
Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.
Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?
Adequate for a simple tool with no parameters, but could mention that the document must be open or that returned data is parsed JSON. Lacks detail on output format.
Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.
Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?
No parameters, schema coverage is 100%. Baseline score of 4 applies as description adds no parameter info but none needed.
Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.
Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?
The description uses a specific verb 'Returns' and resource 'YAML frontmatter of the document' clearly defining its function. It distinguishes itself from sibling tools like 'document_get_content' which return full content.
Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.
Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?
No guidance on when to use this tool versus alternatives such as 'document_get_content' or 'outline_get'. Implied usage but no explicit context.
Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.
We provide all the information about MCP servers via our MCP API.
curl -X GET 'https://glama.ai/api/mcp/v1/servers/juergenkoller-software/inkra-mcp'
If you have feedback or need assistance with the MCP directory API, please join our Discord server