set_default_resume

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

No annotations are provided, so the description carries the full burden. It explains the effect (sets default resume) but doesn't mention persistence, overwriting, error handling, or validation requirements. Minimal but adequate for a simple setter.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

A single clear sentence with no filler. The verb and object are front-loaded, and every word earns its place.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

For a simple one-parameter tool, the description gives essential context, but with no parameter documentation and no annotation coverage, it leaves ambiguity about the 'name' parameter and success/failure behavior. The output schema exists but is not described.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

The single parameter 'name' has no schema description and 0% schema description coverage. The tool description implies it refers to a resume, but doesn't specify what value is expected (exact name, ID), nor whether it must reference an existing resume.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

Description states a specific action (choose/set) with a clear resource (default resume) and context (when tailoring call does not specify one). It distinguishes itself from sibling resume/job tools by focusing on the default-selection behavior.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

Description clearly indicates when this tool is applicable: when a tailoring call does not name a resume. It doesn't enumerate exclusions or alternatives, but the context is well-defined.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.