fo_generate_deeplink

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

With no annotations, the description takes on full behavioral disclosure. It states the tool returns a URL, implying a read-like operation with no persistent side effects, but does not explicitly confirm this or mention any required authentication, rate limits, or potential for modification of system state. The behavior is straightforward but underexplained.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

Two sentences, 14 words, front-loaded with the action and result. Every word earns its place. Highly efficient.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

Given the schema covers all parameters and the tool is simple, the description is mostly complete. It states the return value (affiliate tracking URL) which compensates for the lack of output schema. However, it could briefly explain the purpose of 'linkType' and 'advertiserId' to aid understanding.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

Input schema covers 100% of parameters with descriptions, so baseline is 3. The description adds no extra meaning beyond the schema; it only relates to the 'url' parameter by mentioning 'any merchant URL'. Details for 'linkType' and 'advertiserId' are absent from the description.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description clearly states the tool generates a monetized deep link for any merchant URL and returns the affiliate tracking URL. The verb 'generate' and resource 'deep link' are specific, and the tool is distinct from siblings focused on search, reports, and lists.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

The description implies when to use the tool (to monetize a merchant URL with an affiliate link) but provides no explicit guidance on when not to use it or how it compares to sibling tools like 'fo_search_products' or 'fo_list_promotions'. No prerequisites or exclusions mentioned.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.