ableton_set_tempo
Set the global tempo of an Ableton Live project by specifying a BPM value between 20 and 999.
Instructions
Set Ableton Live tempo in BPM.
Input Schema
| Name | Required | Description | Default |
|---|---|---|---|
| bpm | Yes |
Set the global tempo of an Ableton Live project by specifying a BPM value between 20 and 999.
Set Ableton Live tempo in BPM.
| Name | Required | Description | Default |
|---|---|---|---|
| bpm | Yes |
Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?
Without annotations, the description should disclose behavioral traits, but it only states the basic action. No mention of immediate effect, confirmation, or side effects.
Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.
Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?
Extremely concise with no wasted words. Front-loaded with key information.
Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.
Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?
Given no output schema or annotations, the description lacks context on return values, confirmation, or side effects. It is insufficient for a complete understanding.
Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.
Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?
The description implicitly explains the 'bpm' parameter as tempo in BPM, but schema coverage is 0%. While the parameter name clarifies it, the description adds no additional meaning beyond that.
Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.
Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?
The description clearly states the action (set) and resource (Ableton Live tempo) with unit (BPM). It distinguishes from sibling tools like ableton_set_signature.
Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.
Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?
No guidance on when to use this tool vs alternatives, prerequisites, or when not to use. It simply states the operation.
Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.
We provide all the information about MCP servers via our MCP API.
curl -X GET 'https://glama.ai/api/mcp/v1/servers/jterrats/ableton-live-mcp'
If you have feedback or need assistance with the MCP directory API, please join our Discord server