Skip to main content
Glama

Related Servers

Alternatives to wikicitation-mcp

No user-submitted related servers found.

    Related Servers

    • F
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      D
      maintenance
      Provides Claude with real-time access to Wikipedia through four essential tools: search articles, get full content, retrieve summaries, and find related articles. Enables comprehensive Wikipedia research workflows with structured data access and no API keys required.
      -
    • A
      license
      B
      quality
      A
      maintenance
      Enables AI assistants such as Claude to search academic literature, retrieve abstracts and full text, trace citations and multi-generation citation networks, and analyze author profiles, journal quality and bibliometrics from a conversation. It works with Scopus by default and can run the same analyses against OpenAlex without a subscription.
      35
      30 PyPI
      MIT
    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      D
      maintenance
      Enables AI agents to fact-check claims, verify citations, and check source freshness using Wikipedia, Wikidata, Crossref, and Wayback Machine.
      1
      MIT

    TDQS

    C2.9/5.0

    Scored across 38 tools

    Disambiguation3/5

    Several clusters of tools overlap significantly: get_subcat_table / get_subcat_multiple / get_subcat_with_depth all fetch subcategories, and get_category_pages / get_pages_in_cat_table / get_page_in_cat_multiple all list pages in categories. Count and parsing tools (get_any_count vs the specific *_count tools, parse_cite_type vs parse_citations vs parse_all_citations) also blur boundaries, though descriptions provide some differentiation.

    Naming Consistency4/5

    Most names follow a consistent snake_case verb_noun pattern (get_*, extract_*, parse_*, annotate_*). Minor deviations like mixing 'table', 'multiple', and 'with_depth' suffixes for parallel operations introduce slight unpredictability but overall naming is coherent.

    Tool Count2/5

    38 tools is heavy for the scope, and much of the surface is redundant parallel variants (three subcategory getters, three page-in-category getters, two ISBN annotators, multiple citation parsers). Consolidation would reduce cognitive load.

    Completeness4/5

    Coverage is strong across the domain: extraction, parsing, counting, history at multiple levels (subcategory/page), external annotation via EuropePMC/CrossRef/OpenLibrary/Google Books, and derived metrics like sci_score. Minor gaps only in areas like write/update operations, which may be out of scope.

    Maintenance

    ActivityMaintained
    ResponsivenessNo issues