Skip to main content
Glama
jsilvanus

deployment-mcp

by jsilvanus
OverviewSchemaSourceRelated ServersDiscussionsAdmin
JavaScript
Remote

Related Servers

Alternatives to deployment-mcp

No user-submitted related servers found.

    Related Servers

    • SSH MCP Server

      widjis
      F
      license
      B
      quality
      D
      maintenance
      Enables SSH operations including connecting to remote servers, executing commands, and transferring files between local and remote systems. Supports multiple SSH connections with both password and private key authentication methods.
      18
      -

    • MCP SSH Server

      mahathirmuh
      F
      license
      B
      quality
      D
      maintenance
      Enables seamless SSH operations including secure connections, file transfers, interactive shell sessions, and Docker container management on remote servers. Supports both password and SSH key authentication with credential management and connection pooling.
      18
      -

    • Alolite SSH MCP Server

      jppradhan
      A
      license
      C
      quality
      F
      maintenance
      Enables SSH remote command execution on remote machines with persistent connections, supporting automatic key discovery and connection pooling.
      2
      11 npm
      MIT

    • ssh-mcp

      aposadm
      F
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      C
      maintenance
      Enables remote server management via SSH, including command execution, file transfer (SFTP), and interactive shell sessions, with support for multiple hosts.
      -
    Deploy Server
    One endpoint for every MCP toolRayrun runs every MCP server behind one URL and holds the credentials. Each call is decided per client, tool, and argument, then recorded.ray.runAd

    TDQS

    B3.4/5.0

    Scored across 4 tools

    Disambiguation4/5

    Tools are mostly distinct: git pull, command execution, script execution, and SSH config writing each target different actions. Some overlap between run_command and run_script but descriptions clarify the difference.

    Naming Consistency4/5

    All tools use snake_case with ssh_ prefix, following a verb_noun pattern. `ssh_git_pull` is slightly inconsistent (compound verb) but overall pattern is predictable.

    Tool Count4/5

    Four tools is a reasonable scope for a focused deployment server covering SSH execution and config. Could be expanded but not overly sparse.

    Completeness2/5

    Lacks critical deployment operations like file transfer (scp/rsync), service management, or environment setup. The set is too limited for typical deployment workflows.

    Maintenance

    ActivityInactive
    ResponsivenessNo issues

    Resources