CAU eclass MCP (중앙대 이클래스)
Related Servers
Alternatives to CAU eclass MCP (중앙대 이클래스)
No user-submitted related servers found.
Related Servers
- AlicenseAqualityCmaintenanceMCP server for UNSW students to read Moodle, Ed, and official course outlines, including courses, assignments, grades, forums, and AI use policies, with some write capabilities.40MIT
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityBmaintenanceMCP server that provides tools to interact with SNU eTL (Canvas LMS), including viewing courses, assignments, announcements, grades, downloading and organizing course files, with persistent local storage and automatic sync.MIT
- AlicenseAqualityAmaintenanceRead-only MCP server that lets Jeonbuk National University students query their LMS in natural language, covering daily briefings, deadlines, announcements, assignments, and course materials while keeping credentials local.2517 npmMIT
- AlicenseBqualityAmaintenanceUnofficial CLI to access UPC Aula Virtual (Blackboard) from the terminal, with an MCP server for Claude to manage courses, assignments, and downloads.56246 npm10ISC
- FlicenseAqualityBmaintenanceA local MCP server that lets Claude Code operate the PolyU eStudent portal to check grades, timetable, exams, search subjects, and manage course registration through natural language.9-
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityDmaintenanceEnables Claude to access Chung-Ang University's e-class platform, including dashboard, daily briefing, course details, VOD links, and smart file download.1MIT
TDQS
Scored across 26 tools
Several tools overlap in purpose: search/fetch duplicate aspects of specific eclass_* retrieval tools, export_course_snapshot overlaps with individual get_* calls, and download query tools split across status/list/search. Descriptions help clarify boundaries, but an agent must read carefully to avoid misselection.
Most tools use a consistent eclass_ prefix with snake_case verb_noun naming, such as eclass_get_courses and eclass_submit_assignment. The only deviations are the generic standard tools search and fetch, which are readable and intentionally different.
With 26 tools, the server is heavy for an LMS client surface and exceeds the typical 3-15 well-scoped range. Several adjacent tools, especially download/query and retrieval variants, could likely be consolidated.
Coverage is strong across courses, assignments, grades, announcements, materials, downloads, videos, syllabus, exam schedules, submission, export, and handoff. Minor gaps remain for richer interactive LMS features, but core student workflows are well represented.