Motion MCP Server
Related Servers
Alternatives to Motion MCP Server
No user-submitted related servers found.
Related Servers
- AlicenseBqualityCmaintenanceEnables natural language management of Motion tasks, projects, schedules, and more by bridging the Motion API with LLMs through the Model Context Protocol.10Apache 2.0
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityCmaintenanceEnables AI assistants to manage Motion tasks, projects, workspaces, schedules, comments, custom fields, and recurring tasks through natural-language conversation via the Model Context Protocol.Apache 2.0
- AlicenseBqualityCmaintenanceEnables managing tasks, projects, schedules, users, comments, and more in Motion via natural language through the Model Context Protocol.10Apache 2.0
- AlicenseBqualityCmaintenanceBridges Motion's API with LLMs via the Model Context Protocol, enabling natural language task, project, and schedule management.10Apache 2.0
- AlicenseBqualityCmaintenanceBridges Motion's API with LLMs via the Model Context Protocol, so you can manage tasks, search projects, check your schedule, and more — all through natural conversation.10Apache 2.0
- AlicenseAqualityBmaintenanceBridges Motion's API with LLMs like Claude and ChatGPT via the Model Context Protocol, enabling task management, project search, schedule viewing, and more through natural conversation.10Apache 2.0
TDQS
Scored across 10 tools
Each tool targets a distinct Motion resource (comments, custom fields, projects, recurring tasks, schedules, search, statuses, tasks, users, workspaces). Descriptions clearly differentiate their purposes, leaving no ambiguity for an agent to select the wrong tool.
All tool names follow a consistent pattern: motion_<resource> in snake_case. This makes the tool set predictable and easy to navigate.
With 10 tools covering core resources like tasks, projects, comments, and users, the count is well-scoped for a project management server. Each tool contributes meaningfully without unnecessary bloat.
The set provides comprehensive CRUD and lifecycle operations for tasks, projects, custom fields, and more. Minor gaps exist (e.g., no update for projects, limited user management), but core workflows are well-supported.