Skip to main content
Glama

Related Servers

Alternatives to jupyter-editor-mcp

No user-submitted related servers found.

    Related Servers

    • F
      license
      A
      quality
      A
      maintenance
      MCP server for structural editing of Jupyter notebook cells (list, read, insert, edit, patch, delete, move) without kernel execution.
      10
      -
    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      D
      maintenance
      MCP server for Jupyter notebook navigation and editing. Reads .ipynb files directly as JSON, providing efficient tools for reading, searching, and modifying cells without needing a Jupyter server.
      MIT
    • A
      license
      B
      quality
      B
      maintenance
      An MCP server that connects directly to a Jupyter kernel via ZMQ, enabling AI assistants to read, create, edit, execute, and manage Jupyter Notebooks as MCP tools.
      9
      MIT
    • F
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      D
      maintenance
      A Model Control Protocol (MCP) server that enables remote programmatic control of Jupyter notebooks, allowing AI assistants and applications to create, edit, and execute notebook cells via SSE protocol.
      -
    • F
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      D
      maintenance
      A FastMCP server for loading, editing, searching, and saving Jupyter notebooks (.ipynb) through MCP tools. It maintains a single active notebook session with live cell indices that update as cells are inserted or removed.
      -

    TDQS

    A3.6/5.0

    Scored across 29 tools

    Disambiguation3/5

    Most tools have clear boundaries, but there is notable overlap: ipynb_read_notebook and ipynb_get_notebook_info both return nearly identical notebook summaries, and ipynb_apply_to_notebooks duplicates operations already available via dedicated tools (e.g., set_kernel, clear_outputs, update_metadata). Batch vs single versions are distinct but admirably named.

    Naming Consistency5/5

    All tool names follow a consistent ipynb_ verb_noun pattern, with descriptive verbs like list, get, insert, delete, replace, merge, validate. Even compound verbs like str_replace and search_replace are clear and predictable, and batch variants consistently append '_batch'.

    Tool Count2/5

    At 29 tools, this exceeds the 'too many (25+)' threshold. While the domain is rich, the count feels bloated due to the inclusion of both single and batch versions of many operations, plus near-duplicate read/info tools. A leaner set around 20 would be more appropriate.

    Completeness4/5

    The tool set covers cell CRUD, notebook metadata, kernel settings, validation, searching, and multi-notebook operations like merge, split, and batch processing. Minor gaps exist, such as no explicit 'create new notebook' tool, but agents can work around this via merge or extract flows.

    Maintenance

    ActivityInactive
    ResponsivenessUnresponsive