Skip to main content
Glama
jppradhan

Alolite SSH MCP Server

by jppradhan
OverviewSchemaSourceRelated ServersDiscussionsAdmin
JavaScript
Remote

Related Servers

Alternatives to Alolite SSH MCP Server

No user-submitted related servers found.

    Related Servers

    • SSH Real MCP Server

      danielecr
      A
      license
      A
      quality
      D
      maintenance
      Enables SSH remote command execution on any host using the system ssh binary, supporting existing configurations like ssh-agent, ProxyCommand, and jump hosts.
      2
      30 npm
      MIT

    • ezssh-mcp

      laomeifun
      A
      license
      A
      quality
      C
      maintenance
      Enables executing commands and transferring files over SSH on multiple hosts concurrently, with auto-discovery from SSH config and support for various authentication methods.
      3
      6 npm
      MIT

    • SSH MCP Server

      widjis
      F
      license
      B
      quality
      D
      maintenance
      Enables SSH operations including connecting to remote servers, executing commands, and transferring files between local and remote systems. Supports multiple SSH connections with both password and private key authentication methods.
      18
      -

    • MCP SSH Server

      mahathirmuh
      F
      license
      B
      quality
      D
      maintenance
      Enables seamless SSH operations including secure connections, file transfers, interactive shell sessions, and Docker container management on remote servers. Supports both password and SSH key authentication with credential management and connection pooling.
      18
      -

    • deployment-mcp

      jsilvanus
      F
      license
      B
      quality
      D
      maintenance
      Enables SSH-based deployment operations such as git pull, command execution, script upload/run, and SSH config management.
      4
      -
    Deploy Server
    One endpoint for every MCP toolRayrun runs every MCP server behind one URL and holds the credentials. Each call is decided per client, tool, and argument, then recorded.ray.runAd

    TDQS

    C2.8/5.0

    Scored across 2 tools

    Disambiguation5/5

    The two tools are clearly distinct: one executes commands, the other manages connections. There is no overlap or ambiguity between them.

    Naming Consistency3/5

    Both tools share the 'ssh_' prefix, but 'ssh_execute' is a verb while 'ssh_connections' is a noun. This inconsistency in verb/noun pattern makes the naming slightly mixed, though still readable.

    Tool Count3/5

    With only two tools, the server feels minimal. While the scope is narrow (SSH command execution and connection management), the modest count is borderline—not quite enough to feel comprehensive, but not excessive.

    Completeness2/5

    The tool set covers executing commands and managing existing connections, but lacks common SSH operations like creating new connections or transferring files. These gaps are significant for a server intended to provide SSH functionality.

    Maintenance

    ActivityInactive
    ResponsivenessUnresponsive

    Resources