get_scene_color
Fetch the color of a scene in Ableton Live using its scene index.
Instructions
Get the color of a scene.
Parameters:
scene_index: The index of the scene
Input Schema
| Name | Required | Description | Default |
|---|---|---|---|
| scene_index | Yes |
Fetch the color of a scene in Ableton Live using its scene index.
Get the color of a scene.
Parameters:
scene_index: The index of the scene
| Name | Required | Description | Default |
|---|---|---|---|
| scene_index | Yes |
Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?
No annotations are provided, so the description carries the full burden. It only says 'Get' without disclosing the return format, potential error cases, or any side effects. This is insufficient for a tool with no annotation support.
Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.
Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?
The description is very concise at two sentences with no fluff, and the parameter is mentioned up front. It is efficient, though under-specified.
Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.
Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?
For a simple getter with no output schema, the description should at least mention the format of the returned color or any relevant limitations. It only states the action, leaving the agent to guess what the response will look like.
Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.
Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?
Schema description coverage is 0%, and the description's parameter explanation ('The index of the scene') provides minimal added meaning beyond the schema's type declaration. It does not explain what a scene index represents or how to find it.
Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.
Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?
The description clearly states 'Get the color of a scene' with a specific verb and resource. It distinguishes itself from siblings like get_track_color and get_clip_color by clearly targeting scenes.
Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.
Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?
No guidance is provided on when to use this tool versus alternatives, no prerequisites, and no exclusions. The description only states the basic function without any context on how it fits into the workflow.
Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.
We provide all the information about MCP servers via our MCP API.
curl -X GET 'https://glama.ai/api/mcp/v1/servers/jpoindexter/ableton-mcp'
If you have feedback or need assistance with the MCP directory API, please join our Discord server