disable_profile

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

There are no annotations, and the description carries the full burden of behavioral disclosure. It only says 'disable profile' and gives no information about side effects, reversibility, prerequisites, or what happens to an active profile, so the agent cannot anticipate the operation's impact.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

The description is extremely short and free of fluff, but it is under-specified rather than appropriately concise. It reads almost as a translation of the tool name and omits useful structural information such as parameter context and expected effects.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

With one required parameter, no annotations, no output schema, and many sibling profile tools, this description is too sparse to fully orient an agent. It does not explain the state change, how to re-enable a profile, or how disabling relates to deleting or disconnecting a profile.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

Schema description coverage is 0%, and the description does not mention the 'name' parameter at all. The parameter's purpose is inferable from context, but the description adds no clarification about what name refers to or whether the profile must exist.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description states a clear action ('禁用', disable) applied to a profile, which is a specific verb and resource. It is understandable on its own, though it does not explain how 'disable' differs from deleting or disconnecting a profile.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

No guidance is provided about when to use this tool instead of enable_profile, delete_profile, use_profile, or disconnect_profile. The agent is left to infer the appropriate context from the tool name and sibling list.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.