Skip to main content
Glama
joy7758

titmas-agent-action-gate

by joy7758

Related Servers

Alternatives to titmas-agent-action-gate

No user-submitted related servers found.

    Related Servers

    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      B
      maintenance
      An MCP server for agent authorization that tests the full effect surface and enforces control over consequential actions before dispatch, emitting verifiable execution evidence.
      2
      Apache 2.0
    • F
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      C
      maintenance
      MCP server that enforces governance on agentic decisions with auditable evidence records, providing tools for understanding, calibrating confidence, and navigating handoffs based on policy.
      1
      -
    • F
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      B
      maintenance
      An MCP server that acts as an authorization gateway between an AI agent and external systems, deterministically refusing actions that exceed granted authority and sealing every decision into an auditable chain of custody.
      -
    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      C
      maintenance
      MCP server that provides human-in-the-loop approval for risky AI agent actions, with durable state and audit logs.
      MIT
    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      C
      maintenance
      An MCP server that enforces runtime governance on AI agent actions — file access, command execution, delegation chains, and permission escalation.
      MIT
    • F
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      C
      maintenance
      MCP server that evaluates agent actions against a Policy State Machine, emits a tamper-evident audit trail, and dispatches approved transitions to internal or federated handlers.
      -

    TDQS

    B3.3/5.0

    Scored across 6 tools

    Disambiguation5/5

    Each tool targets a distinct phase of the action gate workflow: submitting a request, attaching evidence, verifying evidence, evaluating the gate, reading state, and recording human approval. There is no overlap in purpose or ambiguity about which tool to use.

    Naming Consistency5/5

    All tool names follow a consistent verb_noun pattern with clear, domain-specific verbs (submit, attach, verify, evaluate, get, record). The naming is uniform, predictable, and free of mixed styles or vague terms.

    Tool Count5/5

    With six tools, the server is well-scoped for an action gate domain. Each tool maps to a core step in the process, avoiding both bloat and a thin surface.

    Completeness5/5

    The tool set covers the complete action gate lifecycle: request intake, evidence attachment and verification, gate evaluation, human approval input, and state inspection. Given the append-only and integrity-focused design, there are no obvious missing operations.

    Maintenance

    ActivityMaintained
    ResponsivenessNo issues