mcp-database
Related Servers
Alternatives to mcp-database
No user-submitted related servers found.
Related Servers
- AlicenseAqualityDmaintenanceA multi-database MCP server supporting MySQL, PostgreSQL, MongoDB, and SQLite with read-only and read-write query capabilities, schema inspection, and SSH tunneling, all without Docker.52MIT
- FlicenseAqualityBmaintenanceA small Python MCP server for querying PostgreSQL and MySQL databases with read-only safety, featuring schema inspection, table description, and query execution tools.8-
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityAmaintenanceMCP server that connects to SQL databases (SQLite, PostgreSQL, MSSQL, MySQL) and provides tools to run read-only queries, list schemas/tables, and manage connections via stdio transport.Apache 2.0
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityDmaintenanceMCP server for exploring SQLite databases, offering tools to list tables, describe table structures, and execute read-only SQL queries.1MIT
- AlicenseCqualityAmaintenanceAn MCP server for interacting with SQLite databases, enabling SQL query execution, schema inspection, and CRUD operations.7MIT
- FlicenseAqualityCmaintenanceA read-only MCP server for SQL Server and PostgreSQL that enables exploring and querying databases (schemas, tables, views, procedures, indexes, foreign keys) and running arbitrary SELECT queries.37-
TDQS
Scored across 13 tools
Most tools have clearly distinct purposes: query vs execute, get_table_info vs get_schema, and search_tables vs sample_rows are all well separated. However, list_databases, check_health, and diagnose_connection all overlap somewhat around connection status and health reporting.
The majority of tools follow a clear verb_noun pattern such as list_tables, get_schema, sample_rows, and search_tables. Minor deviations include the bare verbs query and execute, plus the noun_noun schema_diff, but these do not seriously harm predictability.
With 13 tools, the server is well within the ideal range for a database-focused MCP server. Each tool contributes a distinct capability from schema introspection to querying, health checks, diffs, and ER diagram generation.
The toolset covers the core database workflow well: listing connections and tables, inspecting schemas, sampling data, running read/write SQL, checking health, and comparing schemas. The main gap is lack of DDL or schema modification operations, though execute could partially cover writes if extended.