yatt-ts
Related Servers
Alternatives to yatt-ts
No user-submitted related servers found.
Related Servers
- FlicenseAqualityDmaintenanceEnables AI-powered browser automation controlled through natural language, integrating Playwright with the Model Context Protocol to perform web interactions like navigation, form filling, and screenshots.10-
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityFmaintenanceEnables Model Context Protocol tools for automating web browsers and Electron desktop applications using Playwright's accessibility tree snapshots. It supports window management and JavaScript execution in the main process, providing deterministic automation through structured data.241 npm17Apache 2.0
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityDmaintenanceEnables AI assistants to control web browsers through Playwright automation, providing 50+ tools for navigation, interaction, testing, accessibility audits, and visual testing across Chromium, Firefox, and WebKit.6 npmMIT
- AlicenseBqualityDmaintenanceA Model Context Protocol server that provides browser automation capabilities using Playwright, enabling LLMs to interact with web pages, take screenshots, generate test code, scrape web content, and execute JavaScript in a real browser environment.3215,344 npmMIT
- FlicenseNot gradedqualityCmaintenanceEnables browser automation and testing using Playwright through the Model Context Protocol.-
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityBmaintenanceEnables AI agents to drive Playwright-based browser automation for UI testing, returning JSON/HTML reports with screenshots without server-side LLM or test scripts.1MIT
TDQS
Scored across 35 tools
The tool set is organized by clear resource prefixes (test_, report_, browser_, tab_, session_), and each operation targets a distinct resource or action. A few browser-related tools such as browser_run_step, browser_condition, and browser_click_at have overlapping interaction/inspection responsibilities, but the descriptions clarify their boundaries.
The vast majority of tools follow a consistent snake_case verb_noun pattern, e.g. test_create, browser_open, and session_delete. The exceptions are ping and schema, which are single-word names that do not follow the pattern but are still clear and unlikely to confuse.
35 tools is well over the 25+ threshold and creates a heavy selection surface for an agent. The tools are logically grouped, but the overall count feels excessive for a single MCP server even though each tool has a legitimate role in the testing workflow.
The test lifecycle is well covered: create, read, update, delete, rename, duplicate, validate, run, and export are all present. Minor gaps exist in baseline management, which only offers list and get with no create/delete, and reports lack comparison or export operations, but these are workable gaps.