Skip to main content
Glama
josifb

whichlib

by josifb
OverviewSchemaSourceRelated ServersDiscussionsAdmin
JavaScript
Local

Related Servers

Alternatives to whichlib

No user-submitted related servers found.

    Related Servers

    • mcp-github-tools

      rog0x
      A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      D
      maintenance
      Enables AI agents to perform GitHub analytics and management tasks, including repository analysis, PR summarization, issue triage, release notes generation, and contributor statistics.
      25 npm
      MIT

    • github-repo-mcp

      thedhruv-07
      A
      license
      A
      quality
      B
      maintenance
      Enables AI agents to analyze public GitHub repositories directly through tools for repo health scoring, recent commit summaries, good first issue discovery, and semantic Q&A over docs and issues.
      4
      26 npm
      1
      MIT

    • reposniffer-mcp

      nathan-hoche
      A
      license
      A
      quality
      A
      maintenance
      Enables AI agents to discover and evaluate GitHub repositories from natural-language feature descriptions, returning ranked adoption-grade candidates with evidence and quality signals.
      3
      2
      MIT
    Deploy Server
    Shareable, User-Owned Context BackendPeople, applications, and agents read, write, and coordinate together in one context lake. Reach it over MCP, a CLI, a Python SDK, or REST.fulcradynamics.comAd

    TDQS

    A4.6/5.0

    Scored across 3 tools

    Disambiguation5/5

    Each tool targets a distinct stage of the dependency-adoption workflow: recommend_repos finds candidates from a plain-language need, compare_repos evaluates known names, and trending_repos surfaces new/rising projects. The descriptions explicitly cross-reference each other ('use compare_repos when you already have names', 'not the right tool for picking a dependency'), leaving no realistic overlap.

    Naming Consistency4/5

    All three names are lowercase snake_case and share the '_repos' noun suffix, which makes the set easy to scan. The only minor deviation is 'trending_repos', which uses a gerund/adjectival modifier rather than the verb_noun pattern of recommend/compare_repos.

    Tool Count5/5

    Three tools is exactly the right scope for a narrow library-selection server: discover, compare, and browse trends. Nothing looks padded or missing at the surface level, and each tool earns its place with a distinct workflow role.

    Completeness4/5

    The lifecycle (find candidates -> compare shortlist -> discover new projects) is well covered, including scoring, tiers, and registry download data. The main gap is a single-repository detail lookup: compare_repos requires 2-10 repos, so an agent cannot inspect one already-chosen dependency's full breakdown through a dedicated path.

    Maintenance

    ActivityMaintained
    ResponsivenessUnresponsive

    Resources