Skip to main content
Glama
joshuahickscorp

VisionMCP

by joshuahickscorp
OverviewSchemaSourceRelated ServersDiscussionsAdmin
Python
Local

Related Servers

Alternatives to VisionMCP

No user-submitted related servers found.

    Related Servers

    • Witnessed

      medtekki
      A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      D
      maintenance
      Verifiable action receipts for AI agents — agents sign claims locally, an independent witness countersigns and timestamps, anyone can verify offline.
      19 npm
      MIT

    • Fable-mode

      REX-codebase
      A
      license
      A
      quality
      A
      maintenance
      Mechanical write gates, evidence receipts, and adversarial review for AI coding agents. Fable Mode enforces a Think → Prove → Attack → Write workflow before an agent earns permission to edit a workspace.
      2
      14
      24
      MIT

    • AgentVision

      MeatThrob
      A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      B
      maintenance
      AgentVision is a debug flight recorder MCP server that watches a target program, captures its window and logs, and exposes time-aligned, verified evidence through 90 MCP tools so AI agents can debug running programs without hallucinating.
      3
      MIT

    • Unravel MCP

      EruditeCoder108
      A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      D
      maintenance
      A deterministic AST evidence engine that forces AI agents to debug using verified execution facts instead of pattern-matching symptoms, enabling hallucination-free debugging for MCP-compatible agents.
      8 npm
      Business Source 1.1
    Deploy Server
    One endpoint for every MCP toolRayrun runs every MCP server behind one URL and holds the credentials. Each call is decided per client, tool, and argument, then recorded.ray.runAd

    TDQS

    B3.1/5.0

    Scored across 15 tools

    Disambiguation5/5

    Each tool has a clearly distinct purpose: capabilities, system doctor, project management (create/status/open/close), artifact listing/resolution, visual capture (observe, query, explain, compare, verify), progress reporting, and review queue. No two tools overlap in function.

    Naming Consistency3/5

    Naming uses a mix of conventions: 'vision.capabilities' (noun), 'system.doctor' (noun), 'project.create' (verb), 'vision.open_project' (verb with underscore). While readable, the pattern is inconsistent across tools.

    Tool Count5/5

    With 15 tools, the server covers project, artifact, and visual capture workflows comprehensively without unnecessary bloat. The count feels well-scoped for the domain.

    Completeness4/5

    The tool surface covers core operations: project lifecycle (create/status/open/close), artifact access, visual capture and verification, and review. Minor gaps like absence of project update/delete or artifact removal exist, but the domain is self-contained.

    Maintenance

    ActivitySlowing
    ResponsivenessNo issues

    Resources