bookorbit-mcp
Related Servers
Alternatives to bookorbit-mcp
No user-submitted related servers found.
Related Servers
- AlicenseBqualityDmaintenanceA local MCP server that lets LLM agents read EPUB books and PDF documents with outline-first navigation, precise node reads, and local SQLite persistence.292MIT
- AlicenseAqualityBmaintenanceAn MCP server that lets an LLM browse, search, and download books from OPDS catalogs (e.g., Project Gutenberg, Standard Ebooks) using tools for feed navigation, full-text search, and acquisition link downloads.41AGPL 3.0
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityDmaintenanceMCP server enabling LLMs to query a local Calibre Content Server for ebook metadata, chapters, and content in HTML or Markdown.6 npmMIT
- FlicenseNot gradedqualityDmaintenanceMCP server that gives AI agents access to the world's public domain library. Search, read, and navigate books and audiobooks from Project Gutenberg and LibriVox.-
- AlicenseBqualityCmaintenanceA local MCP server that gives Claude a durable reading room for EPUB and plain text books, enabling chunk-by-chunk navigation, annotations, progress tracking, and shared margin cards.26113MIT
- AlicenseAqualityAmaintenanceA read-only MCP server that connects to Calibre-Web ebook libraries via OPDS feeds, enabling AI assistants to search and browse books, shelves, covers, and library statistics.669 npmMIT
TDQS
Scored across 33 tools
Most tools have clearly distinct purposes, but several groups share similar names (progress/sessions/stats, stats/statistic/dashboard, list/get annotations) which could cause misselection. The detailed descriptions mostly mitigate this, but the naming similarity is noticeable.
All tool names follow a consistent verb_noun snake_case pattern (list_*, get_*, search_*, suggest_*). No mixed conventions or irregular verbs are present, making the naming highly predictable.
With 33 tools, the set is well over the 25+ threshold for 'too many'. Even though the domain is broad, the count feels inflated, especially with many overlapping analytics-style tools that could potentially be consolidated.
The read-only domain is well covered: search, browse, read chapters, track progress, annotations, collections, and analytics. Minor gaps include no generic 'list all books' without a query and no per-library detail tool, but these are workable.