TaskHub MCP Server
Related Servers
Alternatives to TaskHub MCP Server
No user-submitted related servers found.
Related Servers
- AlicenseBqualityBmaintenanceEnables AI assistants to interact with ProjectHub for comprehensive project management through natural language. It provides 25 tools to manage tasks, workspaces, time tracking, notes, and discussions via the ProjectHub API.477 npmMIT
- AlicenseAqualityDmaintenancePersistent, cross-session task management for Claude Code. 24 MCP tools for tasks, projects, dependencies, and docs. 7 skills for planning, standups, and handoffs. Event-sourced storage with per-project isolation.5MIT
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityCmaintenanceConnects Claude to your TickTick account with 28 tools for full CRUD task management, smart queries, batch operations, and GTD support, letting you manage tasks through natural conversation.1MIT
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityBmaintenanceEnables Claude Code and OpenAI Codex to interact with the Weeek task tracker through natural language, covering task creation, searching, updating, moving, completing, commenting, and file attachments via thirteen curated tools.7 npmMIT
- AlicenseAqualityBmaintenanceEnables Claude to interact with System Task projects, teams, and tasks, providing daily briefs, project reports, team load, and risk identification, as well as creating and updating tasks and demands.15MIT
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityBmaintenanceEnables natural-language task management with monday.com-style boards, Kanban, subitems, Git-linked commits, and code TODO import, letting Claude create, update, track, and complete tasks.57 npmMIT
TDQS
Scored across 31 tools
Most tools map clearly to a distinct entity+action, but there are a few close boundaries: search vs. task_get both resolve by systemCode, whoami vs. context both expose linked project context, and task_complete is a specialized task_update. Detailed descriptions mitigate most confusion.
A general noun_verb pattern is visible (task_create, project_invite), but list endpoints are inconsistent: some use _list (orgs_list, tasks_list) while others use bare plurals (comments, notifications, statuses). Irregular names like whoami, connect, tasks_my, and daily_summary break the pattern further, though the naming remains readable.
With 31 tools, the server exceeds the 25-tool threshold for 'too many' in the calibration. The broad domain justifies some surface area, but utilities like whoami, search, and daily_summary could be consolidated with existing list/context tools to reduce redundancy.
Core task operations are well covered: list, get, create, update, complete, delete, and subtasks. However, org and project management lack update/delete operations, comments only support list/add with no edit/delete, and there is no member removal—leaving notable gaps for project administration workflows.