search_boe and get_boe_document form a clean search/retrieve pair over the same corpus, and triage_tenders targets a clearly different dataset (TED/PLACSP) with a different output shape. The only mild overlap is that both search_boe and triage_tenders are 'query a corpus with keywords and filters' operations, so an agent could occasionally hesitate about which entry point to use.

All names are snake_case with a leading verb (search_/get_/triage_), which reads predictably. The minor deviation is that search_boe names the corpus rather than the object (compare get_boe_document), so the noun convention isn't fully uniform.

Three tools is thin for something branded as a 'toolbox', and the surface splits across two fairly different domains (BOE documents vs. tender triage), making the small set feel like two mini-servers glued together. It is defensible for a narrow offline read-only scope, but it sits at the borderline.

The BOE side has adequate read-only coverage (search plus fetch by identifier) for its offline scope. The tender side is a dead end: triage_tenders lists screened tenders but there is no tool to fetch a specific tender's full record or evidence detail, forcing agents to work from the list output alone.