Skip to main content
Glama

Related Servers

Alternatives to verychic-mcp

Related Servers

  • A
    license
    Not graded
    quality
    D
    maintenance
    Provides MCP tools for discovering Groupon-style deals (search, get, compare) for customers, and additionally merchant intelligence tools (category insights, market gaps, price positioning) for logged-in merchants.
    ISC
  • A
    license
    A
    quality
    C
    maintenance
    Enables MCP clients to search hotel availability, validate rates, create and retrieve bookings, simulate or execute cancellations, and browse destinations and hotel content through the Hotelbeds Booking and Content APIs. Includes a surface-and-reconfirm booking flow that re-validates live prices with a tolerance before confirming.
    9
    MIT
  • A
    license
    A
    quality
    A
    maintenance
    Enables MCP clients to search live hotel and vacation-rental listings with the rate each booking site (Booking.com, Expedia, Agoda, Vrbo, Airbnb and others) is charging, and to pull a three-month daily price calendar for a single property. All results come back as JSON using a user-supplied Apify token, with no Google account or local scraping required.
    3
    1
    MIT
  • A
    license
    B
    quality
    A
    maintenance
    Official MCP server for MAQAMI, a hotel and flight booking platform with 3M+ hotels. Search live hotel rates and flights, look up places, airports and hotel details, then prebook and book. Remote Streamable HTTP endpoint, no API key required.
    41
    86 npm
    2
    MIT
  • F
    license
    A
    quality
    D
    maintenance
    A read-only MCP server that lets AI assistants query the WebHotelier REST API for live hotel data, including property info, room availability, rates, calendars, and offers via natural language tools.
    8
    -

TDQS

A4.7/5.0

Scored across 2 tools

Disambiguation5/5

The two tools have clearly distinct roles: one searches and filters the catalogue, the other retrieves detailed availability for a specific offer. Their descriptions explicitly cross-reference each other and there is no functional overlap.

Naming Consistency4/5

Both tools share the 'verychic_' prefix, but the pattern deviates slightly: 'search_offers' follows verb-object while 'offer_details' follows object-descriptor. Still, both names are readable and predictable.

Tool Count4/5

Two tools is minimal, but it matches the narrow read-only scope of browsing and inspecting offers. Each tool is substantial and covers a distinct part of the workflow, so neither feels superfluous or missing.

Completeness5/5

The tool surface covers the complete user journey for a read-only travel-offer catalog: broad search with rich filtering and sorting, then detailed inspection with availability and pricing. No obvious gaps or dead ends exist.

Maintenance

ActivityNo data
ResponsivenessNo issues