Skip to main content
Glama
jordankzf

claude-subagents-mcp

by jordankzf

Related Servers

Alternatives to claude-subagents-mcp

No user-submitted related servers found.

    Related Servers

    • A
      license
      B
      quality
      B
      maintenance
      Enables any MCP host to delegate work to multiple coding-agent CLIs such as Codex, Claude Code, and Antigravity as subagents, preserving native sessions and supporting team-based supervision and agent-to-agent messaging.
      17
      638 npm
      Apache 2.0
    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      B
      maintenance
      Enables users to delegate coding tasks in a chosen project to the official Codex and Claude CLI agents from within an existing chat, then convene a council of configured models to gather independent opinions and review the resulting files and test runs. It also manages multi-provider API connections, model catalogs, and per-task token, time, and cost limits.
      MIT
    • A
      license
      A
      quality
      C
      maintenance
      Delegates work from MCP clients (like Claude Code) to the Codex CLI, allowing spawning of autonomous Codex subagents for tasks.
      2
      765 PyPI
      176
      MIT

    TDQS

    A4.2/5.0

    Scored across 8 tools

    Disambiguation4/5

    Most tools have clearly distinct roles: spawn, wait, get, cancel, send, and list models are well separated. The main possible confusion is between ask_claude and spawn_claude_agent, but the descriptions explicitly distinguish consultation from workspace subagent work.

    Naming Consistency4/5

    The dominant verb_noun pattern is consistent (spawn_claude_agent, cancel_claude_agent, get_claude_agent, list_claude_models). Minor deviations include ask_claude lacking a noun and singular/plural inconsistency between agent and agents.

    Tool Count5/5

    Eight tools is well-scoped for managing the Claude subagent lifecycle: spawn, wait, get, cancel, message, list models, ask, and a recovery list. Each tool has a clear purpose without feeling bloated or thin.

    Completeness4/5

    The core lifecycle is well covered: spawning, waiting, polling, canceling, and follow-up messaging are all present. Minor gaps remain, such as no direct tool for listing all active agents or waiting on more than four at once, but these are workable limitations.

    Maintenance

    ActivityMaintained
    ResponsivenessNo issues