sevdesk-mcp
Related Servers
Alternatives to sevdesk-mcp
No user-submitted related servers found.
Related Servers
- FlicenseBqualityDmaintenanceMCP server for DACH accounting automation. Connect AI assistants to sevDesk and Lexoffice — create invoices, manage contacts, handle bookings and vouchers for German-speaking businesses.1525 npm-
- FlicenseNot gradedqualityBmaintenanceMCP server exposing BuchhaltungsButler API tools for accounting, invoicing, and receipt management with curated, token-efficient endpoints.-
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityDmaintenanceA local MCP server for analyzing DATEV bookkeeping data in natural language. It reads EXTF export files locally and provides tools for balances, open items, and booking search.5MIT
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityAmaintenanceMCP server for agent-first double-entry bookkeeping for Dutch SMEs, supporting VAT, Peppol BIS 3.0 e-invoicing, and local-first SQLite storage with full audit logging and deterministic JSON output.2Apache 2.0
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityDmaintenanceMCP server providing deterministic accounting tools for AI agents, including bank statement parsing, document classification, money math, and webhook verification.2Apache 2.0
- AlicenseAqualityDmaintenanceMCP server providing access to the easybill REST API for managing invoices, customers, articles, payments, projects, and time tracking, with read-only mode by default.2814 npmMIT
TDQS
Scored across 24 tools
Most tools target a distinct resource+action (list_vouchers vs get_voucher vs create_voucher, list_invoices vs create_invoice vs mark_invoice_sent), and the descriptions actively steer between near-neighbours (list_vouchers vs summarize explicitly says use summarize for totals). The only soft overlaps are between the read-only audit tools (audit_vat, reverse_charge_report, find_duplicates) and between the three meta-tools (list_operations, describe_operation, call), but each still has a clearly stated, non-identical job.
All names share a sevdesk_ prefix and mostly follow verb_noun (list_vouchers, create_invoice, mark_invoice_sent, set_tax_rule, diff_receipt_folder). A few are noun phrases or bare verbs without an action verb (summarize, audit_vat, reverse_charge_report, subscription_gaps, invoice_aging), which is a minor deviation but still readable and predictable.
24 tools is at the heavy end, but the domain (bookkeeping: vouchers, invoices, VAT audits, reconciliation, plus a generic API escape hatch) genuinely spreads across that many distinct operations. Each tool has a specific, non-duplicated purpose, so nothing feels like filler despite the count.
Core lifecycle coverage is strong: vouchers can be uploaded, created, fetched, listed, tax-ruled and audited; invoices created, PDFed, sent-marked and aged; plus reconciliation, duplicate detection and summarization. Missing dedicated update/delete and contact/credit-note/order tools are mitigated by list_operations/describe_operation/call, so gaps are workaround-able rather than dead ends.