get_small_bond_daily

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

No annotations are provided, so the description carries the full burden. It implies a safe read-only operation through the verb '조회' (lookup), but it does not disclose any limitations, pagination, rate limits, or error behavior. For a simple data retrieval tool, this is adequate but minimal.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

The description is very concise: one sentence stating the purpose and an Args section explaining the parameter. Every word is purposeful, and the key information is front-loaded.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

Given the tool's simplicity (one required parameter, output schema provided), the description is complete. It names the market, the data frequency, and fully documents the parameter. No additional context is necessary for a straightforward getter.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

The input schema only lists basDd as a string with title 'Basdd' and no description. The tool description compensates fully by explaining the parameter as '기준일자 (YYYYMMDD)' (base date in YYYYMMDD format), adding critical meaning beyond the schema.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description clearly states the tool's purpose: retrieving daily trading information for the small bond market (소액채권시장 일별매매정보). It uses a specific verb ('조회' = retrieve) and resource, and distinguishes itself from sibling tools like get_general_bond_daily and get_kts_bond_daily by specifying 'small bond market'.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

The description provides no guidance on when to use this tool versus alternatives. It only states what the tool does, without mentioning exclusions, prerequisites, or situations where another tool (e.g., get_general_bond_daily) would be more appropriate.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.