Skip to main content
Glama

Related Servers

Alternatives to LexLink-ko-mcp

No user-submitted related servers found.

    Related Servers

    • A
      license
      A
      quality
      C
      maintenance
      MCP server providing comprehensive Korean legal data access (laws, precedents, regulations, ordinances) with citation verification, temporal comparison, impact graphs, and legal research workflows.
      10
      4,664 npm
      MIT
    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      D
      maintenance
      Enables searching and retrieving Korean statutes, precedents, and constitutional court decisions via MCP, using the National Law Information Center API.
      4,664 npm
      1
      MIT
    • A
      license
      A
      quality
      C
      maintenance
      An MCP server that provides Korean legal information through 10 tools, including statutes, precedents, administrative rules, and citation verification with hallucination prevention, enabling legal research and analysis via AI assistants or CLI.
      10
      4,664 npm
      MIT
    • F
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      C
      maintenance
      This MCP server integrates South Korea's national law information, building registers from MOLIT, and KOSIS statistics for housing development research. It enables searching laws, retrieving building details, and accessing statistical data through natural language.
      -
    • A
      license
      C
      quality
      B
      maintenance
      Enables searching, comparing, and analyzing Korean laws and public institution regulations through natural language, integrating 110 MCP tools covering statutes, precedents, and internal rules.
      100
      69 npm
      20
      MIT

    TDQS

    A3.6/5.0

    Scored across 54 tools

    Disambiguation2/5

    Multiple tools have overlapping purposes, such as eflaw_search/law_search (differing only by effective vs announcement date), and numerous linkage/term tools (lstrm_rlt_search, lstrm_rlt_jo_search, dlytrm_rlt_search, jo_rlt_lstrm_search, ls_rlt_search) that are easily confused. The composite tools (chain_full_research, legal_resolver, check_precedent_odds) also overlap significantly in aggregating legal sources.

    Naming Consistency2/5

    Naming conventions are mixed: snake_case (eflaw_search, law_service), camelCase (aiSearch, aiRltLs_search), and bare noun phrases (article_citation, legal_resolver). The suffix pattern is inconsistent—some use _search, some _service, and some use neither (check_precedent_odds, simplify_article).

    Tool Count2/5

    At 53 tools (per the list, though the server claims 54), this is far above the typical well-scoped range. The large number reflects the broad legal domain, but it makes the server unwieldy and increases the risk of misselection.

    Completeness4/5

    The tool set covers an extensive range of Korean legal resources: statutes, administrative rules, ordinances, treaties, precedents, constitutional decisions, interpretations, administrative appeals, committee decisions, and legal terminology, plus composite research workflows. There are minor gaps (e.g., no update/create operations, but these are read-only by design) and some redundant coverage, but overall the domain is well covered.

    Maintenance

    ActivitySlowing
    ResponsivenessNo issues