LightCMS

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

Adds valuable context that folders create URL path segments (behavioral effect beyond creation), which complements the non-destructive annotation. However, omits error conditions, return value structure, and side effects like validation rules.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

Two sentences with zero waste. Front-loaded with the core action, followed by functional context. Every word earns its place.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

Adequate for a simple 3-parameter creation tool with complete schema coverage and safety annotations. Covers the 'what' and 'why' (organization/URLs) but lacks guidance on hierarchical usage patterns and return values expected from the server.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

With 100% schema description coverage, baseline is 3. The description reinforces the 'slug' parameter's purpose via 'URL path segments' but does not add syntax details, validation rules, or explicit notes about parent_id being optional for root folders.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

States specific verb 'Create' and resource 'content folder'. The mention of 'URL path segments' adds distinguishing context from sibling tools like create_collection or create_content, though it lacks explicit contrast with those alternatives.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

No guidance on when to use folders vs. collections or content items, nor mention of prerequisites like unique slug requirements or valid parent_id constraints. Purely definitional description.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.