Skip to main content
Glama
jonmatum

Git Metrics MCP Server

by jonmatum
OverviewSchemaSourceRelated ServersDiscussionsAdmin
TypeScript
Local

Related Servers

Alternatives to Git Metrics MCP Server

No user-submitted related servers found.

    Related Servers

    • MCP Git Analysis Server

      Jaz-spec
      F
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      D
      maintenance
      Analyzes local Git repositories to provide detailed insights into commit statistics, contributor activity, and frequently changed files. It allows users to query repository history and access structured activity data through the Model Context Protocol.
      -

    • git-repo-analyzer-mcp

      AntonyWhatsup
      F
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      B
      maintenance
      Enables analysis of local Git repositories via standard git commands, providing insights like line authorship, commit frequency, code churn, and co-changed files.
      -

    • github-portfolio-intelligence

      Tahas13
      F
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      C
      maintenance
      Provides GitHub repository analysis tools for Claude, including repo summaries, commit history, issue tracking, contributor stats, and code quality assessment. Enables natural language queries about code quality, contributor activity, and repository comparisons.
      -

    • mcp-git-tools

      rog0x
      A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      D
      maintenance
      Enables AI agents to analyze local Git repositories with commit logs, diffs, blame, statistics, and branch analysis using native git commands without requiring a GitHub API.
      24
      MIT
    Deploy Server
    RayrunBuild, deploy, and operate MCP servers without becoming an infrastructure team.ray.runAd

    TDQS

    B3.2/5.0

    Scored across 12 tools

    Disambiguation5/5

    Each tool targets a distinct metrics category (author, ownership, collaboration, commits, quality, etc.), with no functional overlap. Descriptions clearly differentiate them.

    Naming Consistency4/5

    All tools use a consistent 'get_' prefix followed by a descriptive noun phrase, except 'health_check' which omits the prefix. This minor deviation lowers the score slightly.

    Tool Count5/5

    12 tools cover a well-scoped metrics domain without being excessive or insufficient. Each tool provides meaningful and distinct functionality.

    Completeness4/5

    The set covers a broad range of git metrics (author, commits, collaboration, quality, technical debt). Minor gaps exist, such as missing PR or issue metrics, but overall it's fairly comprehensive.

    Maintenance

    ActivityInactive
    ResponsivenessNo issues

    Resources