Skip to main content
Glama
Sign In
jonathanxuu

double-check-mcp

by jonathanxuu
OverviewSchemaSourceRelated ServersDiscussionsAdmin
TypeScript
Hybrid

Related Servers

Alternatives to double-check-mcp

No user-submitted related servers found.

    Related Servers

    • riposte

      SorenSocordia
      A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      B
      maintenance
      Enables deterministic verification of AI agent decisions and actions, providing PASS/FAIL/ABSTAIN verdicts with replayable proofs and an optional signed receipt ledger.
      5 npm
      Apache 2.0
    • jevbook MCP by jevbook

      jevbook MCPofficial

      jevbook
      A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      C
      maintenance
      Enables agents to fact-check claims, conduct verified research, make typed decisions with calibrated probabilities, and scan token risks through a hosted server with no API key required.
      MIT

    • EthersFlow MCP Server

      Ethersflow
      A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      A
      maintenance
      Enables AI agents to verify proposed actions through federated adversarial consensus among multiple LLMs, providing Ed25519-signed attestations to prevent hallucinations, unverified counterparties, and compliance risks before execution.
      1
      MIT

    • zeroH MCP

      khurramcr7
      A
      license
      B
      quality
      C
      maintenance
      Enables AI assistants and autonomous agents to intercept arithmetic and algebraic hallucinations via exact rational verification, seal multi-step reasoning chains with SHA-256 Merkle commitments, and optionally bridge deep verification to a remote sovereign enclave. It also supports BFT epistemic consensus across multi-agent proposals and tamper-evident session sealing.
      9
      MIT
    Deploy Server
    One endpoint for every MCP toolRayrun runs every MCP server behind one URL and holds the credentials. Each call is decided per client, tool, and argument, then recorded.ray.runAd

    TDQS

    A4.4/5.0

    Scored across 3 tools

    Disambiguation5/5

    Each tool has a clearly distinct purpose: full verification with optional web search, offline signature validation, and read-only status/config inspection. The only potential confusion between verify and verify_signature is resolved by the descriptions and by the fact that one calls models while the other validates cryptographic signatures.

    Naming Consistency4/5

    All tool names share the verifier_platform_ prefix and use snake_case, making the namespace predictable. Minor inconsistency: status is a noun rather than a verb, so the naming pattern is not consistently verb_noun.

    Tool Count5/5

    Three tools is a tight, well-scoped set for a verification-focused server. Each tool covers a necessary role: perform verification, verify output integrity, and inspect server status.

    Completeness5/5

    The server covers the full lifecycle of a double-check workflow: generate a signed verification result, independently validate that result's signature, and query platform status/config. No obvious missing operation is implied by the stated purpose.

    Maintenance

    ActivitySlowing
    ResponsivenessNo issues

    Resources