smartlead_update_campaign_schedule

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

No annotations are provided, so the description must fully disclose behavioral traits. It merely states 'Update a campaign's schedule settings' without mentioning side effects, permission requirements, or what happens to existing schedule data. This is insufficient for an agent to understand the tool's impact.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

The description is a single short sentence, making it concise and front-loaded. However, it is somewhat terse and could benefit from a bit more detail without becoming verbose.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

Given the tool has 8 parameters and no output schema, the description is too brief. It does not explain how the parameters interact, the expected outcome, or any constraints (e.g., required fields like campaign_id). The minimal context leaves significant ambiguity for the agent.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

The input schema already describes all 8 parameters with complete coverage (100%). The description adds no additional meaning beyond the schema, so it meets the baseline expectation without enhancing parameter understanding.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description uses a specific verb ('Update') and identifies the resource ('campaign's schedule settings'), clearly indicating the tool's action. However, among sibling tools like 'smartlead_update_campaign_settings' and 'smartlead_update_campaign_status', the description does not differentiate what makes this schedule-specific update distinct.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

There is no guidance on when to use this tool versus alternatives such as 'smartlead_update_campaign_settings' or 'smartlead_save_campaign_sequence'. The description lacks any context about prerequisites, typical use cases, or complementary tools.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.