Skip to main content
Glama

Related Servers

Alternatives to fcop-mcp

No user-submitted related servers found.

    Related Servers

    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      B
      maintenance
      Enables external MCP clients like Claude Desktop, Claude Code, Cursor and Zed to hand work to a local crew of AI agents that plan, write, check and fix code in a folder, while also acting as an MCP client that can use their tools. Runs locally with user-supplied keys, approval-gated commands, diffable and undoable runs.
      AGPL 3.0
    • A
      license
      A
      quality
      C
      maintenance
      MCP server that combines Read+Edit file operations into single tool calls. 80-95% fewer tool calls formulti-file refactoring across Claude, Cursor, Windsurf, and more.
      3
      10 npm
      3
      MIT
    • F
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      D
      maintenance
      A multi-tool task agent MCP server with file search, SQLite query, calculator, and report writing tools. Enables Claude Code, Claude Desktop, or Cursor to control the same tools used by the agent, with guardrails for safety.
      -
    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      B
      maintenance
      Provides 300+ MCP tools for orchestrating AI agents — including swarm coordination, self-learning memory, and task management — enabling MCP clients like Claude Code and Cursor to spawn, coordinate, and learn from specialist agents across sessions.
      19,558 npm
      1
      MIT
    • A
      license
      B
      quality
      A
      maintenance
      Shared rooms for coding agents from different vendors (Claude Code, Codex, Gemini CLI, opencode): 25 MCP tools for room messages, file claims that expire, shared state, memory and moving git branches between machines.
      25
      2,027 PyPI
      5
      MIT
    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      A
      maintenance
      Exposes specialized agents as MCP tools so users can manage and triage Jira tasks, analyze repositories for health and conventions, generate commit/PR/DevOps patterns, assemble reports, produce slides and infographics, and run semantic search over a knowledge base. Everything is invokable directly from inside a coding session in Claude Code, Cursor, or Claude Desktop.
      1
      MIT

    TDQS

    C2.7/5.0

    Scored across 25 tools

    Disambiguation4/5

    Most tools target distinct resources or lifecycle transitions, and the descriptions clarify stage-specific actions. However, inspect_task versus read_task and inspect_workspace versus validate_workspace have subtle boundaries that could cause misselection, and the many lifecycle verbs require careful reading.

    Naming Consistency5/5

    All tool names use consistent snake_case verb_noun phrasing, such as create_task, inspect_family, write_review, and mark_human_approved. The convention is predictable across lifecycle operations, artifact operations, and workspace operations.

    Tool Count3/5

    Twenty-five tools is heavy for the apparent scope, sitting at the upper boundary before the surface feels excessive. The complex protocol justifies many lifecycle operations, but several read/inspect/list variants push the set beyond an ideal well-scoped size.

    Completeness4/5

    The surface covers workspace setup and validation, full task lifecycle transitions, branch/family convergence, reports, reviews, issues, and human approval evidence. Minor gaps remain, notably no read_issue equivalent despite write_issue and list_issues, but core workflows are otherwise covered.

    Maintenance

    ActivityMaintained
    ResponsivenessResponsive