No user-submitted related servers found.
Scored across 213 tools
Most tools are distinguished by resource + scope (global vs project vs template), and several descriptions explicitly disambiguate near-duplicates (e.g. get_global_task warns to use get_task). However, there are genuine near-overlaps an agent can easily mix up: get_task_output vs get_task_raw_output, list_tasks vs list_recent_tasks vs list_global_tasks, list_integrations vs list_project_integration_aliases, and confirm_task/reject_task vs wait_for_task. With 213 tools, selection pressure is high and several boundaries are only clear after reading the full description.
The surface follows a very predictable verb_noun snake_case convention (list_/get_/create_/update_/delete_/set_) with clear resource nouns. Minor deviations exist in noun ordering for a few tools (detach_template_inventory, set_template_default_inventory, stop_template_tasks) and one-off verbs (ping, leave_project, test_project_notification), but overall it is highly readable.
213 tools is an extreme mismatch for any coherent agent-facing surface; this is a 1:1 dump of the Semaphore REST API, including edition-gated routes that return 404 in Community. Many tools (permissions, terraform aliases, TOTP, subscription, cluster) will rarely or never be needed, creating enormous selection cost.
Coverage is essentially exhaustive: full CRUD for projects, templates, tasks, repositories, inventories, integrations, runners, roles, users, views, workflows, and even reference lookups, task polling, and cron validation. No obvious lifecycle gap exists for the Semaphore domain.